2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of phosphate and fluoride from wastewater by a hybrid precipitation–microfiltration process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite several advantages, MF cannot remove contaminants of size <1 µm (i.e., dissolved solids) and it is not useful for the removal of ECs [127,128]. Figure 2.…”
Section: Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several advantages, MF cannot remove contaminants of size <1 µm (i.e., dissolved solids) and it is not useful for the removal of ECs [127,128]. Figure 2.…”
Section: Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excessive discharge of these pollutants into water bodies has deteriorated water quality subsequently [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective methods to remove phosphate and chromate anions from water and wastewater, especially at low concentrations in order to satisfy the stringent water standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various treatment procedures have been reported for the removal of excess fluoride from water e.g. adsorption (Tor et al, 2009), precipitation-micro filtration (Lu and Liu, 2010), ion-exchange (Solangi et al, 2009), electrocoagulation (Behbahani et al, 2011, Khatibikamal et al, 2010, reverse osmosis (Sehn, 2008) and electrodialysis (Banasiak and Schäfer, 2009). Among the methods, adsorption technique is economical, efficient and produces high-quality water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%