2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
123
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
6
123
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an adsorption capability is higher than most common adsorbents [8], except for some activated carbons [9]. However, the adsorption for PhOH is not so effective, in comparison with other adsorbents [9,12,13].…”
Section: Adsorption Capability For Phenolsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such an adsorption capability is higher than most common adsorbents [8], except for some activated carbons [9]. However, the adsorption for PhOH is not so effective, in comparison with other adsorbents [9,12,13].…”
Section: Adsorption Capability For Phenolsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They can persist for many years in the environment because of their resistance to microbiological degradation. In the last decade, various methods have been proposed to remove phenols, including catalytic oxidation [1,2], photo-oxidation [3], electrochemical oxidation [4], biological degradation [5], ultrafiltration [6] and adsorption [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Since the other methods need special process requirements or special catalysts, adsorption seems to be a good choice in terms of the cost and operation for the removal of phenolic compounds from wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These numbers provide compelling enough reasons for the search for cheaper adsorbents. Bentonites (Banat et al, 2000), zeolites (Roostaei and Tezel, 2004;García et al, 1993), surfactant treated smectides (Shen, 2004) and montmorillenites (Jiang et al, 2002), chitin (Dursun and Kalayci, 2005), bagasse fly ash (Srivastava et al, 2006) and organic beet pulp are some possible candidates investigated. However, lower fractional removals and adsorption capacities obtained with these adsorbents raise questions with respect to their efficiency and regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, development of suitable methods for the decontamination of phenols is necessary. Research has studied the removal of phenol from aqueous solutions, including advanced oxidation processes [5,6], biological degradation [7,8], ozonation [9,10], adsorption [11][12][13][14] [19] have been tested for adsorption of phenol and its compounds from aqueous solutions. Among them, carbon materials show significant adsorption yields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%