2004
DOI: 10.1021/es034681k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of PCDD/Fs from Flue Gas by a Fixed-Bed Activated Carbon Filter in a Hazardous Waste Incinerator

Abstract: The adsorption of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) by activated carbon (AC) was examined in a fixed-bed AC unit in a hazardous waste incinerator (IZAYDAS) in Turkey. Results showed that the removal efficiencies of PCDD/Fs decrease as the chlorination level increases, which was explained by the difference in gas/particle partitioning of the compounds. Since dioxins are tightly adsorbed by activated carbon, other flue gas constituents showed no clear effect on the dioxin removal. Adsorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All initial concentrations are average values of three samples. The distribution of 17 toxic PCDD/Fs congeners is shown in Table1, nearly similar with previous investigation Karademir et al, 2004;Yu et al, 2016b). The I-TEQ concentration of PCDFs is higher than PCDDs and 2,3,4,7 and 8-PeCDF is the dominant I-TEQ contributor.…”
Section: The Effect Of Initial Concentration On the Removal Of Pcdd/fssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All initial concentrations are average values of three samples. The distribution of 17 toxic PCDD/Fs congeners is shown in Table1, nearly similar with previous investigation Karademir et al, 2004;Yu et al, 2016b). The I-TEQ concentration of PCDFs is higher than PCDDs and 2,3,4,7 and 8-PeCDF is the dominant I-TEQ contributor.…”
Section: The Effect Of Initial Concentration On the Removal Of Pcdd/fssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In present study, the contact time is fixed due to constant flow rate of carrier gas. And the low removal efficiency of PCDD/Fs at low concentration may be attribute to that the contact time is not enough long for the adsorption of dioxin at lower concentration level (Karademir et al, 2004). Both of them explain that small contact area and short contact time can result in low RE at low concentration.…”
Section: The Effect Of Initial Concentration On the Removal Of Pcdd/fsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PCB homolog removal efficiency by the desulfurization systems increased with increasing chlorination levels of the congeners. Generally, lower chlorinated PCBs with higher vapor pressures are more likely to distribute to gaseous phase, while higher chlorinated PCBs are more likely to distribute to solid phase (Karademir et al 2004). Solid particles in sintering flue gas were intercepted by desulfurization systems, since the systems can effectively remove solid-phase PCBs and it is ineffective in removing particle-phase PCBs.…”
Section: Pcb Concentration Profiles In Flue Gas and Gypsum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, combustion had not sufficiently when waste was fed, PIC still existed. The second reason might be that the highly chlorinated PCDD/Fs with low vapor pressure easily adhered to the particles that were removed by bag filter when APCDs applied (Chang et al, 2002;Karadenir et al, 2004), so the chlorination degree of PCDD/Fs continued to decrease when waste was fed. Precursor formation of PCDD/Fs is a main pathway during start-up (Hunsinger et al, 2002;Aurell and Marklund, 2009) since high amounts of PIC (including chlorophenols) are formed and formation of PCDF (especially low-chlorinated) is favoured (Nakahata and Mulholland, 2000).…”
Section: Pcdd/f Emission At the Stackmentioning
confidence: 99%