2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of natural organic matter and arsenic from water by electrocoagulation/flotation continuous flow reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shorter interelectrode distance is desirable, because the electrical resistance (IR drop) increases with the interelectrode distance increase (Mohora et al, 2012). In accordance with that, when the current density and interelectrode distance were increased from 1 to 3 cm, it was observed that the turbidity removal efficiency decreases (Merzouk et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Effect Of the Interelectrode Distance On The Ecf Treatmesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The shorter interelectrode distance is desirable, because the electrical resistance (IR drop) increases with the interelectrode distance increase (Mohora et al, 2012). In accordance with that, when the current density and interelectrode distance were increased from 1 to 3 cm, it was observed that the turbidity removal efficiency decreases (Merzouk et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Effect Of the Interelectrode Distance On The Ecf Treatmesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The removal efficiencies of copper, of turbidity and of organic substances based on UV 326 absorbance, were evaluated by the following universal equation (Hunsom et al, 2005;Mohora et al, 2012):…”
Section: Determination Of Removal Efficiency Of Copper Turbidity Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mohora et al [47] studied the performance of a laboratory scale electrocoagulation/flotation reactor in removing NOM and arsenic from groundwater. Removal rates were rather high, satisfying the drinking water standards in both cases.…”
Section: Ec In Nom Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal rates were rather high, satisfying the drinking water standards in both cases. Electrode passivation was reduced by adding NaCl to the electrolyte solution, although this did not improve the NOM removal rate significantly [47]. In another study by Mohora et al [48] the change of electrode polarity successfully prevented electrode passivation and enabled highest As removal with the optimal residual Al in treated groundwater.…”
Section: Ec In Nom Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%