2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-010-9071-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Muscle Artifacts from EEG Recordings of Spoken Language Production

Abstract: Research on the neural basis of language processing has often avoided investigating spoken language production by fear of the electromyographic (EMG) artifacts that articulation induces on the electro-encephalogram (EEG) signal. Indeed, such articulation artifacts are typically much larger than the brain signal of interest. Recently, a Blind Source Separation technique based on Canonical Correlation Analysis was proposed to separate tonic muscle artifacts from continuous EEG recordings in epilepsy. In this pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potentially suitable algorithm based on blind source separation was presented by De Vos et al. (2010) for the removal of tonic muscle activity from EEG recorded during spoken language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potentially suitable algorithm based on blind source separation was presented by De Vos et al. (2010) for the removal of tonic muscle activity from EEG recorded during spoken language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, EEG and MEG are well suited to describing the millisecond temporal dynamics of neurological processes and have been instrumental in our current understanding of the cognitive, linguistic and perceptual neurological mechanisms of speech. Unfortunately, both of these methods are susceptible to electromagnetic artifacts from the muscular activation of orofacial muscles used for speech production, which limits studies of speech production to mostly examining pre-vocalization processes [10, 11], or covert speech production [12] with limited investigations during overt production [1316], though recent computational advances in blind source separation are making it more feasible to investigate overt speech production using EEG and MEG [17]. In summary, these limitations make it difficult to simultaneously observe the combined spatial and temporal dynamics during the production of words, in particular for continuously varying speech found in the production of sentences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological difficulties linked to articulatory electromyographic activity in the EEG signal had previously prevented the study of the Ne in correct utterances. These were overcome using a blind-source separation algorithm based on canonical correlation analysis (BSS-CCA, De Clercq et al, 2006; De Vos et al, 2010). Critically, recent work has revealed the Ne in errors and in correct trials emerges before vocal onset (Riès et al, 2011); it starts to rise before auditory feedback can be perceived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%