2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-011-9475-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of methyl parathion and tetrachlorvinphos by a bacterial consortium immobilized on tezontle-packed up-flow reactor

Abstract: A tezontle-packed up-flow reactor (TPUFR) with an immobilized bacterial consortium for biological treatment of methyl-parathion and tetrachlorvinphos was evaluated. These organophosphate pesticides are widely used in Mexico for insect and mite control, respectively. With the aim of developing a tool for pesticide biodegradation, four flow rates (0.936, 1.41, 2.19, and 3.51 l/h) and four hydraulic residence times (0.313, 0.206, 0.133, and 0.083 h) were evaluated in a TPUFR. In the bioreactor, with an operating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed a decrease in the bacterial population present in the microbial consortium, from about 10 7 CFU g -1 to 10 5 CFU g -1 , as the HRT decreased from 62.6 to 4.08 h. This phenomenon may have been due to the shear stress caused by the fluid flow that tends to wash away the attached biofilm from the tezontle stones and increase as the fluid flow rate increases and the hydraulic retention time decreases. A similar trend was observed by Yañez-Ocampo et al [32] in their studies on the removal of parathion and tetrachlorvinphos by a bacterial consortium immobilized on tezontle stones in a packed-bed reactor. To the best of our knowledge, no biomass results have been reported in the few studies available on MTBE biodegradation in packed-bed reactors operating in continuous mode at different hydraulic retention times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results showed a decrease in the bacterial population present in the microbial consortium, from about 10 7 CFU g -1 to 10 5 CFU g -1 , as the HRT decreased from 62.6 to 4.08 h. This phenomenon may have been due to the shear stress caused by the fluid flow that tends to wash away the attached biofilm from the tezontle stones and increase as the fluid flow rate increases and the hydraulic retention time decreases. A similar trend was observed by Yañez-Ocampo et al [32] in their studies on the removal of parathion and tetrachlorvinphos by a bacterial consortium immobilized on tezontle stones in a packed-bed reactor. To the best of our knowledge, no biomass results have been reported in the few studies available on MTBE biodegradation in packed-bed reactors operating in continuous mode at different hydraulic retention times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, tezontle does not contain toxic chemicals, is physically stable, can be sterilized and reused and is a low-cost material abundant in Mexico, and the presence of micropores in its structure allows for the establishment of microbial microcolonies [2729]. Its usefulness as a packing material was demonstrated in different bioremediation processes [27,2932]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies were also carried out by Yañez-Ocampo et al (Yáñez-Ocampo et al 2011 ) using a tezontle-packed up-flow reactor (TPUFR) with an immobilized bacterial consortium for biological treatment of methyl-parathion and tetrachlorvinphos. In the bioreactor, four flow rates (0.936, 1.41, 2.19, and 3.51 l/h) and four hydraulic residence times (0.313, 0.206, 0.133, and 0.083 h) were evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…There are reports on the biodegradation of pesticides using immobilized cells (Ha et al 2009 ; Yáñez-Ocampo et al 2011 ; Abdel-Razek et al 2013 ) and immobilized enzymes (Richins et al 2000 ; Mansee et al 2005 ). However, studies on the degradation of Endosulfan using immobilized cells are limited (Jo et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell immobilization was previously used to make pesticide biodegradation processes more efficient (Kadakol, Kamanavalli, & Shouche, 2011;Yañez-Ocampo, Sanchez-Salinas, Jimenez-Tobon, Penninckx, & Ortiz-Hernández, 2009;Yáñez-Ocampo, Sánchez-Salinas, & Ortiz-Hernández, 2011). This provides multiple advantages over conventional biological systems that use free cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%