Removal of inhibitory substances from human fecal specimens for detection of group A rotaviruses by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reactions
Abstract:A method was developed for the purification of rotavirus RNA from fecal extracts in order to permit the sensitive identification of group A rotavirus in fecal specimens by the polymerase chain reaction. Sequential reactions with reverse transcriptase and Taq polymerase with directed primers from rotavirus gene 6 yielded characteristic 259-base-pair fragments that were then visualized by silver stain on a polyacrylamide gel. As few as 500 genomic copies of purified rotavirus RNA could be detected in this manner… Show more
“…In a preliminary set of assays, 25 faecal samples previously found to be rotavirus-positive by ELISA, PAGE and EM were tested using differ-ent methods of RNA extraction in order to determine the most reliable and efficient procedure. The results of these assays are shown in table I. Phenol-chloroform extraction followed by binding of RNA to CFl 1 cellulose in ST"ðanol and elution with STE, as described by Wilde et al (1990), was an efficient method to recover rotaviral RNA from stool samples free of inhibitory activity. All 25 samples analysed by RT/FCR were positive when phenol-extracted and purified by CFl 1 cellulose, whereas only 11 (44%) were positive when purification with CFll was omitted.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Rna Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNAs extracted from faecal samples with phenol-chloroform were purified using CFll cellulose fibre powder as described by Wilde et al (1990). After phenoI&loroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction (25:24: l), the aqueous phase was mixed with 95 % ethanol to bring the final solution to 15% ethanol (vol/vol).…”
Our aim was to evaluate the reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) technique for the detection of rotavirus shedding by infected children as a routine diagnostic procedure, in comparison to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), electron microscopy (EM) and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of rotavirus double-stranded RNA. Two-hundred and twenty stool specimens were collected from infants and young children with diarrhoea, and 10-20% faecal suspensions were made. Several methods of rotavirus dsRNA extraction were assayed. Electrophoretic analysis of viral RNA was carried out on 10% polyacrylamide gels followed by silver staining. RT/PCR was performed using oligonucleotide primers specific for both 3' and 5' ends of the rotavirus gene encoding VP7 which are highly conserved among group A rotaviruses. Following RNA extraction with phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation, RT/PCR could detect rotaviral RNA in only 11 of 25 samples known to contain rotaviruses by conventional methods. The purification of RNA extracts by CF11 cellulose and the application of the RNAID method were equally effective in extracting RNA and/or removing inhibitory substances from the faecal samples. RT/PCR led to the detection of 66 positive samples from 220 specimens tested (30%), whilst 64 specimens were positive by ELISA (29%), 59 (26.8%) by PAGE and 56 (25.4%) by EM. In our study, RT/PCR was 100 times more sensitive than the ELISA test in detecting rotaviruses serially diluted in a faecal suspension. Although RT/PCR is theoretically much more sensitive than ELISA, PAGE and EM for detection of rotaviruses, great care must be taken to remove inhibitory substances from the enzymatic reactions. We do not consider that RT/PCR should replace immunoassays with high sensitivity and specificity for rotavirus testing in faecal samples, although this technique has other applications, like the search for rotavirus in different clinical specimens (sera, cerebrospinal fluid, respiratory secretions, etc.) and in environmental samples, as well as the typing of viral strains using serotype-specific primers.
“…In a preliminary set of assays, 25 faecal samples previously found to be rotavirus-positive by ELISA, PAGE and EM were tested using differ-ent methods of RNA extraction in order to determine the most reliable and efficient procedure. The results of these assays are shown in table I. Phenol-chloroform extraction followed by binding of RNA to CFl 1 cellulose in ST"ðanol and elution with STE, as described by Wilde et al (1990), was an efficient method to recover rotaviral RNA from stool samples free of inhibitory activity. All 25 samples analysed by RT/FCR were positive when phenol-extracted and purified by CFl 1 cellulose, whereas only 11 (44%) were positive when purification with CFll was omitted.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Rna Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNAs extracted from faecal samples with phenol-chloroform were purified using CFll cellulose fibre powder as described by Wilde et al (1990). After phenoI&loroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction (25:24: l), the aqueous phase was mixed with 95 % ethanol to bring the final solution to 15% ethanol (vol/vol).…”
Our aim was to evaluate the reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) technique for the detection of rotavirus shedding by infected children as a routine diagnostic procedure, in comparison to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), electron microscopy (EM) and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of rotavirus double-stranded RNA. Two-hundred and twenty stool specimens were collected from infants and young children with diarrhoea, and 10-20% faecal suspensions were made. Several methods of rotavirus dsRNA extraction were assayed. Electrophoretic analysis of viral RNA was carried out on 10% polyacrylamide gels followed by silver staining. RT/PCR was performed using oligonucleotide primers specific for both 3' and 5' ends of the rotavirus gene encoding VP7 which are highly conserved among group A rotaviruses. Following RNA extraction with phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation, RT/PCR could detect rotaviral RNA in only 11 of 25 samples known to contain rotaviruses by conventional methods. The purification of RNA extracts by CF11 cellulose and the application of the RNAID method were equally effective in extracting RNA and/or removing inhibitory substances from the faecal samples. RT/PCR led to the detection of 66 positive samples from 220 specimens tested (30%), whilst 64 specimens were positive by ELISA (29%), 59 (26.8%) by PAGE and 56 (25.4%) by EM. In our study, RT/PCR was 100 times more sensitive than the ELISA test in detecting rotaviruses serially diluted in a faecal suspension. Although RT/PCR is theoretically much more sensitive than ELISA, PAGE and EM for detection of rotaviruses, great care must be taken to remove inhibitory substances from the enzymatic reactions. We do not consider that RT/PCR should replace immunoassays with high sensitivity and specificity for rotavirus testing in faecal samples, although this technique has other applications, like the search for rotavirus in different clinical specimens (sera, cerebrospinal fluid, respiratory secretions, etc.) and in environmental samples, as well as the typing of viral strains using serotype-specific primers.
“…Dramatic advances in molecular biology during recent years have coincided with a shift from antigen immunoassays to molecular assays for microbial genomic sequences. This shift has been most prohounced for tests performed directly on clinical specimens, because molecular methods, particularly the PCR, have proven to be substantially more sensitive than their immunoassay counterparts (Wilde et al, 1990). Molecular techniques are better able to differentiate among strains or isolates of microbial species than the traditional strain typing procedures, such as serotyping Tenover, 1998;Tenover et al, 1994;Ushijima et al, 1992).…”
Section: B Molecular Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various measures are taken to prevent cross-contamination, including physical separation of preand postamplification procedures, decontamination of work surfaces with chemicals or UV irradiation, and enzymatic digestion or chemical inactivation of amplified template. Conversely, PCR sensitivity can be diminished by specimens such as feces or whole blood that alter the reaction environment or otherwise inhibit target amplification by the Taq polymerase (Wilde et al, 1990). This inhibition can be detected by including an internal assay control or by spiking a duplicate reaction with control template; inhibition is prevented by purifying DNA or RNA from the specimen.…”
“…Electron microscopy of faeces of diarrhoeic pups should reveal typical wheel-shaped rotavirus particles, 60-80 nm in diameter. RT-PCR also can be used to detect rotavirus RNA in faecal samples [404]. Good timing is critical for establishing the diagnosis from faeces because virus is shed for only a few days in immunocompetent mice.…”
Section: Murine Rotavirus a Or Epizootic Diarrhoea Of Infant Mice Virmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.