2017
DOI: 10.1101/138925
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of inhibition uncovers latent movement potential during preparation

Abstract: 33The motor system prepares for movements well in advance of their execution. In the gaze control system, 34 premotor neurons that produce a burst of activity for the movement are also active leading up to the 35 saccade. The dynamics of preparatory neural activity have been well described by stochastic accumulator 36 models, and variability in the accumulation dynamics has been shown to be correlated with reaction times 37 of the eventual saccade, but it is unclear whether this activity is purely preparatory … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(63 reference statements)
6
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A) was similar to the timing of the SC visual bursts (Fig. 3B), showing a short lag of ~20 ms relative to the bursts that is consistent with an efferent processing delay from SC neurons to the final extraocular muscle drive (Jagadisan and Gandhi, 2017; Smalianchuk et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…3A) was similar to the timing of the SC visual bursts (Fig. 3B), showing a short lag of ~20 ms relative to the bursts that is consistent with an efferent processing delay from SC neurons to the final extraocular muscle drive (Jagadisan and Gandhi, 2017; Smalianchuk et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Our results indicate that the threshold fluctuations are not random, but rather are coordinated with other elements of the circuitry, and although the proposed dynamics remain to be directly tested in other saccadic tasks, substantial agreement can already be found with extant data. For instance, movement-related activity preceding memory-guided saccades or anti-saccades is considerably weaker than for stimulus-driven saccades (Edelman and Goldberg, 2001), consistent with a lower threshold for internally-driven motor plans, and the same is true for saccades that are triggered by blinks (Jagadisan and Gandhi, 2017). The presaccadic activity measured during visual search is less vigorous for incorrect than for correct responses to the same location (Thompson et al, 2005), presumably because the former involve a stronger internal (and erroneous) drive that promotes a lower threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…According to the model, the saccadic threshold is not constant, but rather fluctuates quite dramatically. Such fluctuations are visible when comparing average movement-related activity across experimental conditions (Edelman and Goldberg, 2001; Thompson et al, 2005; Heitz and Schall, 2012; Jantz et al, 2013; Jagadisan and Gandhi, 2017) (Figs. 3, 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, across the active population, the neurons with the earliest buildup onset accumulate activity the longest and therefore have the highest firing rate at both burst onset and at peak. Given their saccade related discharge profiles, these are the putative neurons that project to the brainstem burst generator 54,55 and likely mediate instantaneous control of saccade velocity 56,57 . Further, the constant scaling factor between activity at burst onset to peak burst across channels (Figure 8) provides functional evidence of linear amplification in the motor burst 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%