2015
DOI: 10.7763/jocet.2015.v3.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) from Biogas Using Zero-Valent Iron

Abstract: University of Michigan, where he studied the solidification and oxidization in reactor using the experimental method and numerical simulation. In 1993, he became the associate professor at Kagoshima University, where he studied the thermal fluid flow transport phenomena for rotating machinery and combustion and the development of turbulence model. Since 2003, he became a professor of Department of Mechanical Engineering at Kumamoto University. His research interest on production and development of clean energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore size evaluation of all samples shows they are of more mesopores rather than macrospores. Availability of micropores and mesopores should favor adsorption as reported in the literature [21]. (Figure 3(c)) showed there was small but irregular pore size with roughness on surface due to calcination effect as the result surface area increased which reflects Table 2 above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The pore size evaluation of all samples shows they are of more mesopores rather than macrospores. Availability of micropores and mesopores should favor adsorption as reported in the literature [21]. (Figure 3(c)) showed there was small but irregular pore size with roughness on surface due to calcination effect as the result surface area increased which reflects Table 2 above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In general terms, adsorption may be classified as either physisorption or chemisorption processes, with their major differences summarised in Table 1. In the context of the present review interest, the adsorbate is H 2 S gas, while the adsorbent may be a solid such as activated carbon, impregnated activated carbon, zeolites, or an iron oxide-based material [64]. Activated carbon is commonly employed as the preferred adsorbent because it is a highly porous material with a high adsorption capacity and is reported as being efficient in the removal of low concentrations of H 2 S from biogas via the physisorption process [65].…”
Section: Adsorption Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the mathematical models representing the H 2 S removal from biogas using biofilm on packed bed of SFS are the set of Eqs. (2),(7), (10), (12) and (16). The proposed models have been tested for the experimental data obtained by Fischer [18] and give reasonably results [24].…”
Section: The Column Is Isothermalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several physicochemical processes have been used to remove H 2 S from industrial waste gas streams which include absorption [9,10], scrubbing [11], and adsorption [12] processes. Meanwhile, biofiltration is an alternative process for H 2 S removal from gas [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%