2004
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200420026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Heavy Metals from the Environment by Biosorption

Abstract: The pollution of the environment with toxic metals is a result of many human activities, such as mining and metallurgy, and the effects of these metals on the ecosystems are of large economic and public‐healthsignificance. This paper presents the features and advantages of the unconventional removal method of heavy metals – biosorption – as a part of bioremediation. Bioremediation consists of a group of applications, which involvethe detoxification of hazardous substances instead of transferring them from one … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
295
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 631 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
295
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the majority of conventional technologies are impractical for treating heavy metal at low concentrations due to high operating cost (Gavrilescu, 2004), the range for the initial Cu(II) ion solution was chosen to be 10-60 mg/L. Thus, the temperature (6-25°C), initial Cu(II) ion concentration (10-60 mg/L), and sorbent dosage (0.2-10 g/L)…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of conventional technologies are impractical for treating heavy metal at low concentrations due to high operating cost (Gavrilescu, 2004), the range for the initial Cu(II) ion solution was chosen to be 10-60 mg/L. Thus, the temperature (6-25°C), initial Cu(II) ion concentration (10-60 mg/L), and sorbent dosage (0.2-10 g/L)…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cr 6+ ion sorption process in the HRTB was mostly carried out only on the first 50% of bioreactor length where the pH was below 5 due to the fact that the overall microbial cell surface charge becomes more positive, promoting sorption of anionic Cr 6+ ion species (Baes and Mesmer, 1976;Zhou et al, 2007). Furthermore, hydrodynamic conditions in the HRTB also affected all previously mentioned factors (Gavrilescu, 2004). Therefore, on the basis of these results it is clear that biological and hydrodynamic conditions in the HRTB have a significant effect on the suspended biomass concentration and its sorption capacity (Table 2).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, different biological methods could be applied because they do not destroy metals, but concentrate and immobilize them (Gavrilescu, 2004;Vieira et al, 2012;Michalak et al, 2013;Sicupira et al, 2014;Vieira et al, 2014). Biosorption is the removal of metals and their complexes by biological materials such as active or inactive microorganisms, microbial aggregates or biofilms (Singh et al, 2006;Baysal, et al, 2009;Xie, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In naturally polluted environments, the heavy metal toxicity of microbes depends largely on the concentration and availability of metals 11 . The most common heavy metal tolerate microbes are fungi and yeast 12,13 . They are a versatile group, as they can adapt and grow under various extreme conditions of pH, temperature and nutrient availability, as well as high metal concentrations 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%