2010
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metals and cyanide from gold mine wastewater

Abstract: This paper reviews the technology and biotechnology to remove heavy metals (such as copper, arsenic, lead and zinc) and cyanide from contaminated wastewater. The paper places special emphasis on gold mine wastewater and the use of low cost materials as sorbent. Various biological as well as physicochemical treatment processes are discussed and compared on the basis of costs, energy requirement, removal efficiency, limitations and advantages. Sorption using natural plant materials, industrial and agricultural w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
(157 reference statements)
1
126
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to problems such as membrane fouling, high costs, high energy requirement and low removal efficiency, these processes show scant relevance in industries. In general, technical applicability, cost-effectiveness and plant simplicity are the key factors in selecting the most suitable treatment method to remove heavy metals (such as copper, arsenic, lead and zinc) and cyanide from contaminated ecosystem (Acheampong et al 2010). However, the latest technologies like photocatalytic reduction, surfactant-based membranes, liquid membranes and surface complexation are more efficient for heavy metals removal from contaminated ecosystems (Malaviya and Singh 2011;Xu et al 2012).…”
Section: Remediation Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to problems such as membrane fouling, high costs, high energy requirement and low removal efficiency, these processes show scant relevance in industries. In general, technical applicability, cost-effectiveness and plant simplicity are the key factors in selecting the most suitable treatment method to remove heavy metals (such as copper, arsenic, lead and zinc) and cyanide from contaminated ecosystem (Acheampong et al 2010). However, the latest technologies like photocatalytic reduction, surfactant-based membranes, liquid membranes and surface complexation are more efficient for heavy metals removal from contaminated ecosystems (Malaviya and Singh 2011;Xu et al 2012).…”
Section: Remediation Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] Cyanide poisoning can be fatal; nevertheless, cyanide is still either used or produced in large quantities in metal plating, mining, and in the production of gas and pharmaceuticals. [4] More than a million tons of cyanide are produced annually worldwide, and a number of accidental leaks and spills of cyanide have had disastrous consequences. [5] The World Health Organization has suggested 1.9 mm to be the maximum acceptable level of cyanide in drinking water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the structure and surface functional groups of a sorbent, temperature has an impact on the adsorption capacity within the range of 20-35 o C [45]. It is well known that a temperature change alters the adsorption equilibrium in a specific way determined by the exothermic or endothermic nature of a process [29].…”
Section: Process Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%