2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metal (Hg(II) and Cr(VI)) ions from aqueous solutions using Fe2O3@SiO2 thin films as a novel adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional methods including coagulation, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, membrane separation, reverse osmosis, oxidation, evaporation, electro-flotation, and solvent extraction were successfully employed for the removal of heavy metals [73,96]. However, most of these methods have some disadvantages such as complicated treatment process, high cost, and high energy demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods including coagulation, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, membrane separation, reverse osmosis, oxidation, evaporation, electro-flotation, and solvent extraction were successfully employed for the removal of heavy metals [73,96]. However, most of these methods have some disadvantages such as complicated treatment process, high cost, and high energy demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron oxides, namely, goethite FeO(OH), maghemite γ-Fe 2 O 3 , hematite α-Fe 2 O 3 , and magnetite Fe 3 O 4 , can be considered promising materials for the uptake of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. Among their merits are low costs, availability, good sorption properties, possibility of modification, and lack of toxicity, which was confirmed by numerous studies, e.g., [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. In particular, iron oxides are capable of removing copper, europium, and cerium from aqueous solutions in the range of pH from 5 to 9, reaching a yield of 95–97%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, the experimental data (q exp ) were closer to the data (q e2 ) obtained from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model than those (q e1 ) calculated from the pseudo-first-order model. This result meant that adsorption occurred not only on the cell surface but also through mass transfer via particle diffusion [45,46]. Thus, the adsorption of lead ions occurred through chemisorption [47].…”
Section: Isotherm and Kinetic Modeling Of The Biosorption Of Pb(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%