2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.868837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of fluoride from aqueous media by magnesium oxide-coated nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the removal of various contaminants from drinking water were performed by using nanomaterial adsorbents due to their unique properties such as large surface area, high reactivity, high specificity, and self-assembly (Qu et al, 2013). Various metal oxides and hydroxides of aluminium, iron, zirconium, magnesium, chromium and manganese ions based nanoparticles (NPs) had been reported (Kumar et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2010;Minju et al, 2013;Sivasankar et al, 2011) for fluoride removal from water (Meenakshi and Maheshwari, 2006). Although bimetallic or mixed oxides such as Mn-Ce, Al-Ce, Zr-Mn and ceramic adsorbents were also studied for fluoride removal, some of these materials present disadvantages in terms of pH range, high cost and low adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the removal of various contaminants from drinking water were performed by using nanomaterial adsorbents due to their unique properties such as large surface area, high reactivity, high specificity, and self-assembly (Qu et al, 2013). Various metal oxides and hydroxides of aluminium, iron, zirconium, magnesium, chromium and manganese ions based nanoparticles (NPs) had been reported (Kumar et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2010;Minju et al, 2013;Sivasankar et al, 2011) for fluoride removal from water (Meenakshi and Maheshwari, 2006). Although bimetallic or mixed oxides such as Mn-Ce, Al-Ce, Zr-Mn and ceramic adsorbents were also studied for fluoride removal, some of these materials present disadvantages in terms of pH range, high cost and low adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mg-Fe-La 112.17 [44] Polygonum orientale Linn. (Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 modification) 0.77 [45] Fe-Al-La 8.17 [46] CeO 2 /Al 2 O 3 50 [47] Fe 3 O 4 /CS/Al(OH) 3 76.63 [48] MIL-24(Al)-NH 2 1070.6 [49] Al-Cu oxide nanoparticles supported on steel slag 89.5 [50] LaP-POT(lanthanum phosphate and poly-otoluidine) 10.94 [51] Iron ore 1.45 [52] Dolomite 0.011 [53] Acid-modified pyrolusite (PA-2) 0.58 [54] Li/Al-LDH 35.4 [55] Fe-La-Ce 303.03 [56]…”
Section: Adsorbent Fluoride Removal Capacity (Mg/g) Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments showed that the functionalization of zirconium(IV)-metalloporphyrin showed good efficiency for uoride adsorption with high specicity and selectivity. Similarly magnesium oxide (MgO)-coated magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) nanoparticles with magnetic properties were synthesized by Minju et al 60 using a modied sol-gel method for analyzing the uoride scavenging potential. The adsorption capacity was found to be 10.96 mg g À1 .…”
Section: Magnetic Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%