2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of epoxiconazole and pyraclostrobin from highly contaminated effluent (grams per liter level): Comparison between ozone and solar still decontamination using real field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, researchers showed significant technological advancements in terms of productivity and efficiency enhancement of SS. Other researchers reported sterilization effects if water interacted with radiation can through the termination of microorganisms as a result of the applied heat to the contaminated water [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers showed significant technological advancements in terms of productivity and efficiency enhancement of SS. Other researchers reported sterilization effects if water interacted with radiation can through the termination of microorganisms as a result of the applied heat to the contaminated water [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticide degradation using a number of common techniques is a well-studied field. Washings with water, chlorine baths, ozonated water, ozone, mild acids and hydrogen peroxide have been documented to be somewhat effective (summarized in Table S1 of the SI) at the removal of pesticide residues from the surface of fruits and vegetables (Hoff et al, 2019; Lester et al, 2017; Sadło et al, 2017; Savi et al, 2016; Bajwa & Sandhu, 2014; Cengiz & Certel, 2014; Junges et al, 2013; Karaca et al, 2007; 2012; Kusvuran et al, 2012; Wu et al, 2009; 2007; Crowe et al, 2006; Ikehata & Gamal El-Din, 2005; Hwang et al, 2001b; 2002; 2003). Using these wash techniques can increase the risk of microbial contamination (CDC, 1989; DiCaprio et al, 2015; Franz et al, 2008; Gombas, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%