2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.769698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Cr (III) from model solutions and a real effluent byPhanerochaete chrysosporiumisolated living microorganism: equilibrium and kinetics

Abstract: A B S T R A C TRemoval of Cr (III) was investigated using Phanerochaete chrysosporium-isolated living microorganism; pH, contact time, temperature and nutrients addition were examined. It was found that P. chrysosporium can tolerate up to 600 mg/L chromium solution. The optimal growth conditions of the biosorbent were found to be 35˚C, 26 h contact time and pH = 5. In addition, a complex nitrogen substrate, yeast powder, was shown to be most efficient than a synthetic one, like di-hydrogen ammonium phosphate. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key subject in adsorption technologies is to develop an efficient adsorbent with a rapid, selective, costeffective and highly effective adsorption process; this has received intensive research attention. Thus, a variety of materials, such as activated carbons, 13 zeolites, 14 and biomaterials, 15 have been investigated as adsorbents for heavy metal ion removal from wastewater. However, these adsorbents generally need to be separated from the water treatment system aer the adsorption process by methods such as centrifugation or ltration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key subject in adsorption technologies is to develop an efficient adsorbent with a rapid, selective, costeffective and highly effective adsorption process; this has received intensive research attention. Thus, a variety of materials, such as activated carbons, 13 zeolites, 14 and biomaterials, 15 have been investigated as adsorbents for heavy metal ion removal from wastewater. However, these adsorbents generally need to be separated from the water treatment system aer the adsorption process by methods such as centrifugation or ltration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an initial concentration of 58.82 mg L 21 exhibited the highest removal of chromium in the range of 56-73% for an average residence time of 24 h. Leles [26] studied the biological reduction of chromium (VI) and removal of total chromium in an anaerobic filter followed by a submersion in a biofilter with intermittent aeration using a mixed culture of microorganisms. The results showed that for an initial chromium (VI) concentration of 120 mg L 21 , chromium [(VI) and total] removals were 100% after 168 h. In this work, for an initial chromium (VI) concentration of 100 mg L 21 , the time required for the total reduction of chromium (VI) was only 8 h. Sepehr et al [13] used 35 C, 26 h contact time and pH 5 25 with a complex culture medium and observed high chromium (III) removal (98%). Sepehr et al [11] sought and isolated sustainable microorganisms and studied their application to the removal of Cr (III) from simulated and real solutions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Electromagnetic Field Frequencymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The results showed that for an initial chromium (VI) concentration of 120 mg L −1 , chromium [(VI) and total] removals were 100% after 168 h. In this work, for an initial chromium (VI) concentration of 100 mg L −1 , the time required for the total reduction of chromium (VI) was only 8 h. Sepehr et al . used 35°C, 26 h contact time and pH = 25 with a complex culture medium and observed high chromium (III) removal (98%). Sepehr et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations