2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by metal-organic framework nanoadsorbents: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, the removal rate of TeCP by AB-Fe3O4 was higher than AB, regardless of the initial concentration of TeCP, due to stronger non-covalent π-electron acceptor-donor interactions and larger surface area. Furthermore, the removal rate of TeCP continuously decreased with the increasing initial concentration of TeCP in both AB and AB-Fe3O4 cases, and these results could be explained by the fact that limited active sites were available when the mass of the adsorbent was fixed for binding adsorbates [43]. Subsequently, we tried to evaluate equilibrium isotherms for adsorption of TeCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4 for further investigation.…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Ph and Initial Tecp Concentration On Tecpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the removal rate of TeCP by AB-Fe3O4 was higher than AB, regardless of the initial concentration of TeCP, due to stronger non-covalent π-electron acceptor-donor interactions and larger surface area. Furthermore, the removal rate of TeCP continuously decreased with the increasing initial concentration of TeCP in both AB and AB-Fe3O4 cases, and these results could be explained by the fact that limited active sites were available when the mass of the adsorbent was fixed for binding adsorbates [43]. Subsequently, we tried to evaluate equilibrium isotherms for adsorption of TeCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4 for further investigation.…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Ph and Initial Tecp Concentration On Tecpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant by-products may become more severe threats to both organisms and environment as possess higher stability and probably more poisonous. Currently, the removal of these CECs from wastewater is accomplished by three major approaches, namely biological treatment, physical methods such as adsorption and ion exchange, chemical technique such as oxidation and phase transfer catalysis [123]. Adsorption through traditional activated carbon followed by coagulation are less effective due to the low concentration of CECs and competitive adsorption by natural organic matter [124].…”
Section: Contaminants Of Emerging Concerns Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, many review papers have recognized gaps in the current knowledge, whereby the majority of studies conducted concern the adsorption of very high concentrations of the heavy metals investigated, or do not explore the effects of preparation conditions on the functionalized nanomaterials (such as oxidation process duration, etc.) or the combined effects of different parameters on the adsorption process, or do not investigate the potential mechanism and chemistry involved in the heavy metals removal [1,4,10,11,[13][14][15][16]. Oxidation of CNT is one of the simplest and therefore most economically viable functionalization techniques [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%