2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of chromium ion (III) from aqueous solution by manganese oxide and microemulsion modified diatomite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus Li et al [17] used two types of modified diatomites (by microemulsion and manganese oxide). The chemical composition of the unmodified material, determined by X-ray fluorescence gave the following percentages: SiO 2 , 71.…”
Section: Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Li et al [17] used two types of modified diatomites (by microemulsion and manganese oxide). The chemical composition of the unmodified material, determined by X-ray fluorescence gave the following percentages: SiO 2 , 71.…”
Section: Chromiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there have been a number of studies of DE material-based adsorption of Cu and other heavy metals (e.g., nickel, mercury, chromium) from aqueous media [17,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]34]. Another recent study has also reported on the removal of Cu(II) from synthetic electroplating rinse water by using PEI impregnated ion-exchange resin [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), their abundance in nature and low cost are most desirable. These essential characteristics have also led to the current, rapidly growing interest in its application to water purification [17,[21][22][23][24]. For instance, the adsorption behaviour of heavy metal ions (e.g., Ni(II), Pb(II), Cu(II), Cd(II) and Th(IV)) and organic contaminants onto pristine and modified DE particles from aqueous solutions under different conditions (e.g., pH and temperature), have been investigated [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost identical range of G 0 values for adsorption of Cr(VI) on different adsorbents were reported by other researchers. The values of G 0 for binding of Cr(VI) were reported as −0.44 KJ mol −1 at 303 K with bentonite [70], −3.72 to −4.81 KJ mol −1 with Al 2 O 3 [71,72], −6.26 to −8.96 KJ mol −1 at 293-323 K with Al-Mg mixed metal oxides [73,74] even though much higher magnitude of G 0 (−40 KJ mol −1 ) was observed for modified clay materials [56]. Higher the negative values of G 0 (−30 to −40 KJ mol −1 ), higher would be the possibility of binding Cr(VI) with the active sites of adsorbents through hydrogen bonding and subsequently, chemisorption would be favored to some extent [75].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%