2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of cadmium and hexavalent chromium from electroplating waste water using thiocarbamoyl chitosan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At pH higher than 3, because ion HCrO 4 −1 turns into ion CrO 4 −2 and the adsorbent surface is deprotonated, adsorption of CrO 4 −2 is restricted due to the presence of negatively charged ions and competitive − OH, the low positive surface charge density of the adsorbent and the weakening of the electrostatic forces of attraction between the parallelly charged adsorbate and adsorbent. The results of the study are consistent with results obtained in previous researches [17,18].…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…At pH higher than 3, because ion HCrO 4 −1 turns into ion CrO 4 −2 and the adsorbent surface is deprotonated, adsorption of CrO 4 −2 is restricted due to the presence of negatively charged ions and competitive − OH, the low positive surface charge density of the adsorbent and the weakening of the electrostatic forces of attraction between the parallelly charged adsorbate and adsorbent. The results of the study are consistent with results obtained in previous researches [17,18].…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, chitosan hydrogel beads were studied for removal of nitrate (Chatterjee and Woo 2009), and protonated chitosan beads were used for fluoride (Viswanathan et al 2009). Chaunhan et al (2012) studied the removal of cadmium and hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewater using thiocarbamoyl chitosan; Miretzky and Cirelli (2009) studied Hg(II) removal from water not only by chitosan but also its derivatives; and Chen and Chung (2006) evaluated the removal of As(III) and As(V) from water by chitosan itself due to its excellent biological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are advantageous in low toxicity, low cost, and high efficiency. Polymers have been widely used for heavy metal removal from contaminated water (Çavuş and Gürdağ 2008;Chauhan et al 2012;Nastasović et al 2004), while their application in contaminated soils is not well documented. Chitosan, a copolymer of 2-glucosamine and N-acetyl-2-glucosamine, is one of the potential candidates for remediating heavy metal contaminated soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%