2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of basic dye by modified Unye bentonite, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of MB the % removal increased from 93.55% (at pH 3.0) to 96.88% (at pH 7.0), while it increased from 86% (at pH 3.0) to 96.12% (at pH 7.0) in the case of CV. Similar observations have been reported for the adsorption of MB and CV using different biosorbents (Ponnusami et al, 2009;Eren, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Removal Of Mb And CVsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of MB the % removal increased from 93.55% (at pH 3.0) to 96.88% (at pH 7.0), while it increased from 86% (at pH 3.0) to 96.12% (at pH 7.0) in the case of CV. Similar observations have been reported for the adsorption of MB and CV using different biosorbents (Ponnusami et al, 2009;Eren, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Removal Of Mb And CVsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is assumed that the rate is not limited by mass transfer from the bulk solution to the external surface of adsorbent due to the particles are vigorously agitated during the sorption period [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Kinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments of adsorption equilibrium and kinetics were carried out as similarly described before [15]. The amount of CV + adsorbed (mmol/g), (q e ), onto bentonite was calculated from the mass balance equation as follows:…”
Section: Dye Adsorption Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%