2010
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2010.2060334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Ballistocardiogram Artifacts Using the Cyclostationary Source Extraction Method

Abstract: Ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifact is considered here as the sum of a number of independent cyclostationary components having the same cycle frequency. Our proposed method, called cyclostationary source extraction (CSE), is able to extract these components without much destructive effect on the background electroencephalogram (EEG). It is shown that the proposed method outperforms other methods particularly in preserving the remaining signals. CSE is utilized to remove the BCG artifact from real EEG data record… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the EEG data acquired using 128-electrodes for the analysis of peak-to-peak value in time domain were grouped over 11 scalp regions as: Prefrontal (PF): (9,14,15,21,22), Anterior Frontal (AF): (2,3,12,16,23,26,34), Frontal (F): (1,4,11,14,21,15,19,24,27,32,33 (70, 75, 83). The difference between maximum peak and minimum peak in the EEG epochs based on R-R interval of ECG has been calculated and averaged per channel and then averaged over the electrodes per region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the EEG data acquired using 128-electrodes for the analysis of peak-to-peak value in time domain were grouped over 11 scalp regions as: Prefrontal (PF): (9,14,15,21,22), Anterior Frontal (AF): (2,3,12,16,23,26,34), Frontal (F): (1,4,11,14,21,15,19,24,27,32,33 (70, 75, 83). The difference between maximum peak and minimum peak in the EEG epochs based on R-R interval of ECG has been calculated and averaged per channel and then averaged over the electrodes per region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artifact which is more complex, dynamic and problematic to remove is the BCG artifact. The BCG artifact varies significantly within magnetic scanners, channels and individuals [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent applications are in the following subjects: analysis of genome signals [19], neuroscience [20], ballistocardiogram analysis [128], heart and lung sound separation [129], analysis of the embolic blood Doppler signal [132], foetal PQRST extraction from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings [143], heart and respiration rates monitoring [183], heart sound signal selection [217], heart sound cancelation from lung sound [218], detection and characterization of a runner's fatigue [38,235], analysis of electromyographic signals [296], modeling and analysis of ground reaction force signals [97,300], and analysis of myoelectric signals [3].…”
Section: Biological Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications are considered in the following fields: acoustics and mechanics [10,14], radio astronomy and astrophysics [78,100,145], optics and spectroscopy [105,310,309], analysis of genome and biological signals [19,97,128,132,235], finance and econometrics [27,43,160,204], and climatology [84,125,151,190,308].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other widely used adaptive template approaches for BCG suppression such as Forbes and Fiume (2005) can be interpreted as weighted PCA to incorporate temporal model updates. Methods based on independent component analysis (ICA) (Srivastava et al, 2005; Ghaderi et al, 2010; Liu et al, 2012) also are used widely. All such blind source separation approaches, as reviewed in Grouiller et al (2007) and Vanderperren et al (2010), are limited to performing component extraction based on the contaminated data alone, agnostic of the structural difference between BCG and EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%