2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00415-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of As(V) from wastewaters by chemically modified fungal biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
113
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it is assumed that limited adsorption St (mg/g) St (mg/g) capacity of the adsorbent up to S max (9.86 mg/g), which is comparable with other related studies using ferric modified organic adsorbents or inorganic reagents (Lorenzen et al, 1995;Singh et al, 1996). However, the adsorption capacity is lower when compared to biomass modified with cationic polyelectrolyte (Loukidou et al, 2003). The mechanism of As (V) adsorption on the surface of amorphous Fe (III) oxyhidroxides involves both inner and outer sphere complexation (Goldberg and Johnston, 2001;Jonsson and Sherman, 2008).…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore it is assumed that limited adsorption St (mg/g) St (mg/g) capacity of the adsorbent up to S max (9.86 mg/g), which is comparable with other related studies using ferric modified organic adsorbents or inorganic reagents (Lorenzen et al, 1995;Singh et al, 1996). However, the adsorption capacity is lower when compared to biomass modified with cationic polyelectrolyte (Loukidou et al, 2003). The mechanism of As (V) adsorption on the surface of amorphous Fe (III) oxyhidroxides involves both inner and outer sphere complexation (Goldberg and Johnston, 2001;Jonsson and Sherman, 2008).…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Nowadays, there is a trend to use the alternative and low-cost materials for arsenic removal from the waters in laboratory or medium-scale experiments. Effectiveness of chemically modified or native biomass in processes of arsenic removal was evaluated and proved by various authors (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2007;Boddu et al, 2008;Cernansky et al, 2007;Loukidou et al, 2003;Malakootian et al, 2009;Murugesan et al, 2006;Rahaman et al, 2008;Seki et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the approaches proposed, adsorption is one of the most popular methods and is currently considered as an effective, efficient, and economic method for water purification. The adsorbents used include activated carbon (Nouri et al, 2002;Pereira et al, 2003), clay minerals (Celis et al, 2000;Abollino et al, 2003), zeolites (Oliveira et al, 2004), metal oxides (Wu et al, , 2005Zhang et al, 2007a), agricultural wastes (Robinson et al, 2002), biomass (Loukidou et al, 2003) and polymeric materials (Atia et al,2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three principle advantages of biological technologies for the removal of pollutants; first, biological processes can be carried out in situ at the contaminated site; Second, bioprocess technologies are usually environmentally kind (no secondary pollution) and third, they are cost effective (Loukidou et al, 2003). In looking at waste or wastewater as resource, Sim (2014) highlighted the need to explore bio-effluent in reclamation for non-potable reuse of wastewater, or biosolids in nutrient recovery and soil amendments as well as biogas for renewable energy generation.…”
Section: Wastewater Management and Treatment Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%