2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of arsenate by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide modified magnetic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arsenic adsorption increases with decreasing MNP particle size [280] and phosphate competes against As for adsorption [281]. CTAB modified MNPs adsorb more As(V) than MNPs alone [282]. Fe3O4-graphene-LDH removes almost twice as much As(V) as LDH alone [283].…”
Section: Arsenic Phosphate Molybdate Fluoride Seleniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic adsorption increases with decreasing MNP particle size [280] and phosphate competes against As for adsorption [281]. CTAB modified MNPs adsorb more As(V) than MNPs alone [282]. Fe3O4-graphene-LDH removes almost twice as much As(V) as LDH alone [283].…”
Section: Arsenic Phosphate Molybdate Fluoride Seleniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles for heavy metal removal has a great potential in wastewater engineering. Jin et al (2012) reported that modification of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) greatly enhanced As(V) adsorption capacity from 7.59 to 23.07 mg g −1 which is over 95 % removal of As(V) (100 μg L −1 ) using 0.1 g L −1 Fe 3 O 4 @CTAB within 2 min at pH 6 and more than 90 % at a wide pH range from 3 to 9. Arsenate adsorption agreed well with pseudo-second order kinetic model and two-site Langmuir isotherm model with the arsenate adsorption capacity of 23.07 mg g −1 , which was twice greater than the results obtained using pure Fe 3 O 4 .…”
Section: Iron Oxide Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPION functionalization provides a more active adsorption sites accessible to both arsenite and arsenate. The most important reason for the observed increase of is the decrease of SPION aggregation by a dispersion that leads to a higher availability of adsorption positions [10,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Adsorption Capacity Comparison With Similar Adsorbent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%