2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, radiation dose data from spinal diagnostic angiographies were commonly published from cohorts with heterogeneous pathologies [1,4,[10][11][12]14]. In contrast, we rather aimed to collect homogeneous data dedicated to a specific spinal vascular pathology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, radiation dose data from spinal diagnostic angiographies were commonly published from cohorts with heterogeneous pathologies [1,4,[10][11][12]14]. In contrast, we rather aimed to collect homogeneous data dedicated to a specific spinal vascular pathology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRL for spinal endovascular procedures is still to be determined by the National Federal Office of Radiation Protection, and reference values in the literature are scarce and variable [1,4,[9][10][11][12]. We conducted a retrospective singlecenter study to analyze radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and amount of contrast material in diagnostic spinal angiographies performed in a homogeneous group of patients presenting with SDAVFs in order to provide data valuable for the establishment of novel DRLs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many publications focus on radiation protection issues in fluoroscopy and specially in interventional procedures [1,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. The common feature of all studies is that patient dose optimization in interventional procedures occurs by a combination of equipment protocol modification and operator behaviour, and not simply by changing the protocol characteristics.…”
Section: Fluoroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Despite DSA being considered the gold standard for vascular evaluation, its inherent invasiveness and ionizing radiation limit its suitability as a preferred screening examination. [11] Among the other methods mentioned, contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) offers several advantages such as unrestricted tissue penetration depth, absence of ionizing radiation, high tissue resolution, and abundant post-processing techniques. [12][13][14] Although the non-enhanced MRA is widely utilized in clinical practice due to its ability to provide vessel images without the need for contrast agent administration, this technology still possesses several inherent limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%