2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of aflatoxin B1 from contaminated peanut oils using magnetic attapulgite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the risk of AFB 1 contamination, several approaches for the detoxification of peanut oil have been proposed, including chemical (alkali [4] and ozone [5] treatments), biological (microbial adsorption and degradation [6]), and physical methods (UV irradiation [7,8], photocatalysis [9], and adsorption [10]). Although the detoxification rate of peanut oil could be around 99% when using UV irradiation, photocatalysis, or ozone treatment, new toxins with equal or high toxicity compared to AFB 1 may be generated during the detoxification of peanut oil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the risk of AFB 1 contamination, several approaches for the detoxification of peanut oil have been proposed, including chemical (alkali [4] and ozone [5] treatments), biological (microbial adsorption and degradation [6]), and physical methods (UV irradiation [7,8], photocatalysis [9], and adsorption [10]). Although the detoxification rate of peanut oil could be around 99% when using UV irradiation, photocatalysis, or ozone treatment, new toxins with equal or high toxicity compared to AFB 1 may be generated during the detoxification of peanut oil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption method was easy to perform, especially for oil substrates that cannot be detoxified by alkali treatment, such as peanut oil, sesame oil, and rapeseed oil. Therefore, it was proposed that the adsorption method may be an adequate strategy for the detoxification of vegetable oils contaminated by AFB 1 [10]. To date, many types of adsorbents have been described as having the ability to adsorb AFB 1 , such as clay minerals [11,12] and organic/biological adsorbents [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aflatoxins mainly pollute cereals, oils, and their products [ 8 ]. As an important agricultural raw material, peanut is directly in touch with A. flavus and A. parasiticus in the soil [ 9 ]. Peanut is highly susceptible to the contamination of aflatoxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These absorbents are suitable agents for AFB1 decontamination in poultry feed [108] and in AFB1-contaminated vegetable oils [109][110][111]. In these experiments, the dose of adsorbents, treatment time, temperature, initial toxin concentration, and pH were the critical parameters of efficiency [110,111]. The AF-reducing capability of chitosan nanoparticles has also demonstrated in several studies [112,113].…”
Section: Chemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Adsorption has also been evaluated as a possible mycotoxin-reducing method, and different kinds of adsorbents, nanoparticles, nanocomposites, and magnetic-activated carbon were tested extensively. These absorbents are suitable agents for AFB1 decontamination in poultry feed [108] and in AFB1-contaminated vegetable oils [109][110][111]. In these experiments, the dose of adsorbents, treatment time, temperature, initial toxin concentration, and pH were the critical parameters of efficiency [110,111].…”
Section: Chemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%