2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal character of vertical jet polishing with eccentric rotation motion using magnetorheological fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-aperture polishing processes are characterized by a small tool whose dwell time map on the optic is implemented by computer control, thus they are also known as computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS). Various CCOS processes have been developed since the 1970s, such as small tool computer controlled polishing [7,8], Magnetorheological Finishing [9], ion beam finishing [10], and so forth [11,12]. These processes have brought great promotion of surface figure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-aperture polishing processes are characterized by a small tool whose dwell time map on the optic is implemented by computer control, thus they are also known as computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS). Various CCOS processes have been developed since the 1970s, such as small tool computer controlled polishing [7,8], Magnetorheological Finishing [9], ion beam finishing [10], and so forth [11,12]. These processes have brought great promotion of surface figure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4]. Generally, a deterministic subaperture CCOS process relies on three key elements: (1) the exact surface form measured by a laser interferometer or other profilers; (2) the stable and quantitative tool influence function (TIF) with proper size and removal rate produced by polishing tools, such as rigid tools [5,6], pitch tools [7,8], conformal tools [9] and other semi-compliant or compliant tools [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18];…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative method to be more quick and economical may be numerical simulations of TIFs according to the classical Preston [6,7,13,[15][16][17][18] or other modified models [22]. These models lead us to believe that the material removal at the contact interface is mostly produced by interactions of the polishing pad, abrasives, and the workpiece; then the TIF can be simulated by relative velocity, pressure distribution, and other parameters at the working interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that aim, various processes of subaperture polishing [computer-controlled polishing (CCP)] are developed for high-precision components in optical manufacture at present, for instance, computer control optical surfacing (CCOS) [1][2][3], bonnet polishing (BP) [4,5], fluid jet polishing (FJP) [6][7][8], and magnetorheological jet polishing (MJP) [9][10][11]. Generally, they can be divided into two process classes, which are distinguished by the generation mechanism of the footprint [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other class is the kinetic machining methods, where the footprint is generated by process parameters and not by tool contact, e.g., ion beam polishing (IBF) [12], FJP, and MJP. Therefore, the surface form and located position are the weaker effects for uniform removal character [8,10]. The MJP, which was initially developed by QED [13], is characterized by steady and small footprints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%