2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal and retention of viral aerosols by a novel alumina nanofiber filter

Abstract: Journal of Aerosol Science 40 (2009) 65-71. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.09.003Received by publisher: 2008-03-22Harvest Date: 2016-01-04 12:19:58DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.09.003Page Range: 65-7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, PC filters have a smooth surface that could be less damageable to viruses. Furthermore, other filter properties are known to affect the physical recovery of viral aerosols such as the filter's surface electrostatic charge (Li et al 2009) or whether the material is hydrophobic (PTFE) or hydrophilic (PC) (Reitz 2005). However, our qRT-PCR results show no significant differences between the two tested filters for the airborne viral recovery of the two tested bacteriophages suggesting that the overall particle collection efficiency is not significantly altered by the composition of the filter when using our experimental settings (RH, temperature, MMAD of particles and sampling time).…”
Section: Comparison Of Pc and Ptfe Filters For Airborne Viral Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, PC filters have a smooth surface that could be less damageable to viruses. Furthermore, other filter properties are known to affect the physical recovery of viral aerosols such as the filter's surface electrostatic charge (Li et al 2009) or whether the material is hydrophobic (PTFE) or hydrophilic (PC) (Reitz 2005). However, our qRT-PCR results show no significant differences between the two tested filters for the airborne viral recovery of the two tested bacteriophages suggesting that the overall particle collection efficiency is not significantly altered by the composition of the filter when using our experimental settings (RH, temperature, MMAD of particles and sampling time).…”
Section: Comparison Of Pc and Ptfe Filters For Airborne Viral Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the coliphage MS2 (Golmohammadi et al 1993), a small non-enveloped bacterial virus (Leviviridae family) with a capsid diameter of 25 nm and a genome made of a single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecule (3569 nucleotides), has been used as an airborne viral model in many aerosol studies (Barker and Jones 2005;Burton et al 2007;Eninger et al 2009;Grinshpun et al 2007;Hogan et al 2005;Hogan et al 2006;Hogan et al 2004;Holton and Webb 1994;Kettleson et al 2009;Li et al 2009;Perrott et al 2009;Tseng and Li, 2005;Walker and Ko, 2007;Wang and Brion 2007). The Pseudomonas syringae virulent phage phi 6 is another well characterized bacterial virus that has some interesting features as a surrogate for RNA viruses, although it has been used only sporadically in aerosol studies (Ellis and Schlegel 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the most-penetrating particle size (MPPS), FE is mainly determined by three mechanisms : (1) interception, by which particles following an airstream flow line come within one radius of a fiber and adhere to it; (2) impaction, whereby larger particles fail to follow the curving contours of airstreams around the fiber and strike the fiber; and (3) diffusion, a result of the collision of small particles with gas molecules, which deflects their path through the filter. To improve filtration performance, electret and nanofiber (NF) media have also been introduced (Barrett and Rousseau 1998;Lehtimaki and Heinonen 1994;Li et al 2009;Wang 2001;Wang et al 2008;Yang and Lee 2005;Yun et al 2007). Electret filters utilize electrostatic attraction to improve aerosol collection, and NF filters lower the flow resistance through gas slip over the smaller-diameter fibers.…”
Section: Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alumina nanoparticles and nanofiber show interesting properties such as ability to be formed into structures that enhance the functions of osteoblast for bone replacement [65,66], to form ultrathin alumina hollow fiber microfilm membrane [67] for separation processes, to form novel nanofilter for removal and retention of viral aerosols [68] and to serve as high performance turbidity filter [69]. The preparation of the final form of alumina fiber may involve the use of binders such as acid phosphate and silica colloid binder or polymers [70].…”
Section: Alumina Nanofiber Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%