2012 Oceans 2012
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2012.6404987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remotely-Operated Vehicle applications in port and harbor site characterization: Payloads, platforms, sensors, and operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have already pointed out the possibilities of ROV-based detection of unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the past. A 2012 contribution [34] described the ROV detection capabilities of UXO in seaport operations. Recent contributions connect specialised ROV systems for electromagnetic detection [35] with UXO detection in the context of offshore site surveys [36].…”
Section: Micro Rov Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have already pointed out the possibilities of ROV-based detection of unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the past. A 2012 contribution [34] described the ROV detection capabilities of UXO in seaport operations. Recent contributions connect specialised ROV systems for electromagnetic detection [35] with UXO detection in the context of offshore site surveys [36].…”
Section: Micro Rov Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar small form DVL was integrated onto another hand-held inspection-class ROV for an exercise to discover and characterise unexploded ordnance (UXO). The team discovered that, due to the proximity of the DVL to the thrusters, noise issues resulted in poor navigation readings [162]. DVLs are generally integrated into INS systems for more refined positioning using Kalman filter equations.…”
Section: Navigation and Positioning Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ROV tools provide a comprehensive, real-time picture of the seafloor (Figure 3) in the area surveyed, and are deployable to commonly 300 meters depth. There are several commercial off-the-shelf and custom positioning technologies which can accurately position an ROV to sub-meter accuracy, including ultrashort baseline (USBL) and Doppler velocity log (DVL) (Keranen et al, 2012). The ROV video data can be used to judge general bottom conditions such as mud or sand conditions, debris density, effects of currents, etc.…”
Section: Sageep 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%