2020
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remotely observed variations of reservoir low concentration chromophoric dissolved organic matter and its response to upstream hydrological and meteorological conditions using Sentinel-2 imagery and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree

Abstract: Freshwater lakes are facing increasingly serious water quality problems. Remote sensing techniques are effective tools for monitoring spatiotemporal information of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), a biochemical indicator for water quality. In this study, the Gradient Boosting Regressing Tree (GBRT) model and Sentinel-2A/B image were combined to estimate low CDOM concentrations (0.003 m−1 < aCDOM(440) <1.787 m−1) in Xin'anjiang Reservoir, an important drinking water resource in Zhejia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our earlier work, we have reported the building of such a recommender based on a modular architecture structured system, in which individual gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) are trained from dyeing manufacturing records for single types of fabric versus dye combinations [14]. GBRT can predict dye concentrations with prediction errors as good as ~7-10% [14], and have also been successfully applied into other applications with great model performance [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our earlier work, we have reported the building of such a recommender based on a modular architecture structured system, in which individual gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) are trained from dyeing manufacturing records for single types of fabric versus dye combinations [14]. GBRT can predict dye concentrations with prediction errors as good as ~7-10% [14], and have also been successfully applied into other applications with great model performance [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%