2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab0d3e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote timed up and go evaluation from activities of daily living reveals changing mobility after surgery

Abstract: Background. Mobility impairment is common in older adults and negatively influences the quality of life. Mobility level may change rapidly following surgery or hospitalization in the elderly. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) is a simple, frequently used clinical test for functional mobility; however, TUG requires supervision from a trained clinician, resulting in infrequent assessments. Additionally, assessment by TUG in clinic settings may not be completely representative of the individual's mobility in their home e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots were narrower than those of Saporito's Bland-Altman plots, which means our estimated TUG is essentially equivalent to the measured actual TUG. Saporito and colleagues developed the remote TUG prediction model with 2.1 s of MAPE [23]. Thus, the developed model demonstrated prediction errors (foot: MSPE = 1.124s, RMSPE = 1.046 s, MAPE = 0.865 s, pelvis: MSPE = 1.162 s, RMSPE = 1.065 s, MAPE = 0.921 s, foot-pelvis combination: MSPE = 1.192 s, RMSPE = 1.075 s, MAPE = 0.918 s) that are less than Saporito's prediction errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots were narrower than those of Saporito's Bland-Altman plots, which means our estimated TUG is essentially equivalent to the measured actual TUG. Saporito and colleagues developed the remote TUG prediction model with 2.1 s of MAPE [23]. Thus, the developed model demonstrated prediction errors (foot: MSPE = 1.124s, RMSPE = 1.046 s, MAPE = 0.865 s, pelvis: MSPE = 1.162 s, RMSPE = 1.065 s, MAPE = 0.921 s, foot-pelvis combination: MSPE = 1.192 s, RMSPE = 1.075 s, MAPE = 0.918 s) that are less than Saporito's prediction errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [20][21][22] identified the different stages of the TUG test using the actual TUG test or similar settings, but we aimed to estimate the TUG test using normal ground walking with daily-life settings. Saporito et al introduced a remote mobility monitoring method by estimating TUG from free-living activities [23]. We compared our TUG prediction results with Saporito's TUG estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed excellent outpatient compliance with sensor wear, minimal gaps in data collection, and no device malfunctions during the study period. Wearable sensors reasonably estimate results of accepted functional tests such as the timed up-and-go test [7]. Analyzing outpatient sensor information to guide medical decisions would represent a paradigm shift from traditional strategies based on rigid follow-up schedules, untriggered patient contact, and waiting for patients to call to report a problem to more timely care, with potential clinical benefits from shorter delays to interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of limitations, small sample sizes were the most common one with all studies reporting participants between 15-25. Another common limitation is the Western centric participant pools of the studies (Saporito et al, 2019).…”
Section: Wearable Sensor Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%