2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing upscaling of interception loss from isolated oaks: Sardon catchment case study, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
11
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LAI values between 3.1 and 1.6 m 2 m -2 (1.1-0.6 m 2 m -2 in our case). Other studies with low-density stands of holm oak also reported negligible stemflow yields (Mateos and Schnabel, 2001;Hassan et al, 2017). On a tree scale, our data are much closer to the values reported elsewhere (Bellot and Escarré, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…LAI values between 3.1 and 1.6 m 2 m -2 (1.1-0.6 m 2 m -2 in our case). Other studies with low-density stands of holm oak also reported negligible stemflow yields (Mateos and Schnabel, 2001;Hassan et al, 2017). On a tree scale, our data are much closer to the values reported elsewhere (Bellot and Escarré, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…c Previous studies in Speulderbos report a LAI of 11: that value was estimated by the destructive method (cf. Heij and Schneider, 1991). For comparative reasons, we use the reported value using the LI-COR photometer.…”
Section: Energy Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our estimation of S is comparable with that of other old Douglas fir stands (Table 8) and supports the hypothesis that LAI might not be the main predictor of S for Dou- Klaasen et al (1998) reported an LAI measured by the destructive method, but LAI estimated with Li-COR-2000 was 8 m 2 m −2 (cf. Heij and Schneider, 1991). NA = not available.…”
Section: Canopy Storage Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the scarcity of fine spatial-resolution RS products, in the local scale IHMs, only tailor-made quantitative RS applications based on moderate, high-or very high-spatial resolution images can be utilized such as for example: (1) evapotranspiration mapping using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with spatial resolution ranging from 0.5 to 1 km (Bastiaanssen et al 1998a, b;Su 2002) or at highresolution using Landsat 8 imagery with spatial resolution of 100 m (Senay et al 2016); (2) tree transpiration mapping using very high-resolution QuickBird or WorldView at 60-40 cm per pixel (Reyes-Acosta and Lubczynski 2013); (3) tree interception using QuickBird and WorldView at 60-40 cm per pixel (Hassan et al 2017); the aforementioned tree transpiration and tree interception mapping methods require tree-scaling functions, which for nine dominant Kalahari tree species are presented by Lubczynski et al (2017).…”
Section: Experience Of Using Remote Sensing In Data-scarce Central Kamentioning
confidence: 99%