2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing tree classification with a multilayer perceptron

Abstract: To accelerate scientific progress on remote tree classification—as well as biodiversity and ecology sampling—The National Institute of Science and Technology created a community-based competition where scientists were invited to contribute informatics methods for classifying tree species and genus using crown-level images of trees. We classified tree species and genus at the pixel level using hyperspectral and LiDAR observations. We compared three algorithms that have been implemented extensively across a broa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MLP classifiers performed best among the implemented classifiers because MLP mostly performed well for noisy, big, and complex data [35]. The MLP classifiers [36,37] are explained below; the production of input weight and bias are summed up using the summation function (ρ n ) given in Equation (29).…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLP classifiers performed best among the implemented classifiers because MLP mostly performed well for noisy, big, and complex data [35]. The MLP classifiers [36,37] are explained below; the production of input weight and bias are summed up using the summation function (ρ n ) given in Equation (29).…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural net classifiers were trained to extract pure grapevines row pixels from high-resolution hyperspectral images. We chose to use a neural net classifier due to the recent success of neural networks in hyperspectral image classification [76][77][78][79][80]. The neural net classifiers were implemented using ENVI version 5.5 software (Harris Geospatial Solutions Inc., Boulder, CO, USA) by providing regions of interest for five different classes, including grapevine, grass, vine canopy, shadow, and soil (Figure 3a).…”
Section: Canopy Row Extraction From Hyperspectral Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to balance the accuracy and time cost, three neurons for the hidden layer are selected in this experiment. As for the epochs and the learning rate, the figures 200 and 10 −4 are chosen, respectively, to prevent overfitting [34,51]. Furthermore, the activation function, loss function, and optimizer are selected as the rectified linear unit (ReLU), squared error, and adaptive moment estimation (ADAM), respectively.…”
Section: Phenological Normalization Based On Multilayer Perceptronmentioning
confidence: 99%