2019
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2019.2911855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Scene Classification Using Convolutional Features and Deep Forest Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, algorithms employing deep learning (DL) (i.e., Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)) [12] have also become very popular for LULC classification [13]. Recently, several powerful architectures of DL models have been developed for the classification of RS images [14][15][16]. It is, however, still arguable how well these DL algorithms perform against ensemble algorithms and SVM for the purpose of urban LULC classification.…”
Section: Machine Learning Classifiers For Object-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, algorithms employing deep learning (DL) (i.e., Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)) [12] have also become very popular for LULC classification [13]. Recently, several powerful architectures of DL models have been developed for the classification of RS images [14][15][16]. It is, however, still arguable how well these DL algorithms perform against ensemble algorithms and SVM for the purpose of urban LULC classification.…”
Section: Machine Learning Classifiers For Object-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the typical deep architectures, CNN provides a strong ability of feature extraction and yield significant performance improvement on scene classification. There have already been several attempts to use deep CNN features for classifying the remote sensing images [3][4][5]21,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. Wang et al [26] employed CaffeNet with the soft-max layer for scene classification.…”
Section: The Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AlexNet [43] 88.35 ± 0.85 −0.84 CaffeNet [43] 90.48 ± 0.78 +1.29 GoogLeNet [43] 89.19 ± 1.19 0 VGG-16 [42] 90.70 ± 0.68 +1.51 VGG-19 [43] 89.76 ± 0.69 +0.57 ResNet-50 [43] 91.93 ± 0.61 +2.74 ResNet-152 [43] 92. 47 • WHU-RS19 Dataset:…”
Section: Wrt Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is to depend on the pretrained CNNs to extract the feature vectors of HRRS images and then input them into other classifiers for classification [42]- [46]. Boualleg et al used the well-known VGGNet-16 to extract deep features and then fed to deep forest classifier for classification, which saved a considerable amount of training time [43]. Weng et al obtained image feature vectors through AlexNet, then classified images by extreme learning machine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%