2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3150801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Scene Classification by Local–Global Mutual Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerging deep learning methods such as graph convolutional networks (GCNs) [34], neural architecture search (NAS) [35], generative adversarial networks (GANs) [36], local-global learning [37] [38] and others [39]- [41] have also been used in scene classification. Xu et al [42] design a deep feature aggregation framework based on GCN.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Remote Sensing Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emerging deep learning methods such as graph convolutional networks (GCNs) [34], neural architecture search (NAS) [35], generative adversarial networks (GANs) [36], local-global learning [37] [38] and others [39]- [41] have also been used in scene classification. Xu et al [42] design a deep feature aggregation framework based on GCN.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Remote Sensing Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve global representation of CNNs, Lv et al [37] propose the local-global-fusion feature extraction network, which leverages RNNs to capture contextual information. And Chen et al [38] propose the local-global mutual learning (LML) method to obtain different features and learn from each other through KL. However, they are still difficult to improve the extraction of CNN for long-range features.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Remote Sensing Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these deep learning based methods, CNNs are the most commonly-utilized [2], [18]- [21], [44] as the convolutional filters are effective to extract multi-level features from the image. In the past two years, CNN based methods (e.g., DSENet [45], MS2AP [46], MSDFF [47], CADNet [48], LSENet [5], GBNet [49], MBLANet [50], MG-CAP [51], Contourlet CNN [52], STHP [53], SAGM [54], DARTS [55], LML [56], GCSANet [57]) still remain heated for aerial scene classification. On the other hand, recurrent neural network (RNN) based [25], auto-encoder based [58], [59] and generative adversarial network (GAN) based [60], [61] approaches have also been reported effective for aerial scene classification.…”
Section: A Aerial Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of our AGOS with three handcrafted features (PLSA, BOW, LDA) [17], [87], three typical CNN models (AlexNet, VGG, GoogLeNet) [17], [87], twentytwo latest CNN-based state-of-the-art approaches (MIDCNet [2], RANet [29], APNet [88], SPPNet [20], DCNN [28], TEXNet [89], MSCP [18], VGG+FV [21], DSENet [45], MS2AP [46], MSDFF [47], CADNet [48], LSENet [5], GBNet [49], MBLANet [50], MG-CAP [51], Contourlet CNN [52], STHP [53], SAGM [54], DARTS [55], LML [56], GCSANet [57]), one RNN-based approach (ARCNet [25]), two autoencoder based approaches (SGUFL [59], PARTLETS [58]) and two GAN-based approaches (MARTA [60], AGAN [61]) respectively. The performance under the backbone of ResNet-50, ResNet-101 and DenseNet-121 is all reported for fair evaluation as some latest methods [47], [48] use much deeper networks as backbone.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve representational power, multi-branch methods employ multi-branch architecture to consider some different inputs such as multi-scale of an image [13], [14], or different images [15], [16]. Wang et al [17] proposed a multiscale representation by a global local dual-branch architecture.…”
Section: Cnn Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%