2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.srs.2023.100108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing reveals how armed conflict regressed woody vegetation cover and ecosystem restoration efforts in Tigray (Ethiopia)

Emnet Negash,
Emiru Birhane,
Aster Gebrekirstos
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study [26] showed that the colony loss rate in Tigray was lower (at 15.7% overall, and ranging from 9% to 19.5% between local areas) than the results in this survey and was similar when compared to international (overall proportional) loss rate figures of COLOSS reported as 16.4% to 20.9% [3][4][5]. This indicates that most of the colony losses in Tigray reported in the present study can be attributed to the disaster of the two-year war in the region, which agrees with recent reports that the Tigray war caused 70% honey bee colony losses [39] and reversed decades of ecosystem restoration [37,53], agricultural development [54,55] and livelihood improvement [34] efforts. These effects could lead to shortage of bee forage and increase rates of colony absconding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A previous study [26] showed that the colony loss rate in Tigray was lower (at 15.7% overall, and ranging from 9% to 19.5% between local areas) than the results in this survey and was similar when compared to international (overall proportional) loss rate figures of COLOSS reported as 16.4% to 20.9% [3][4][5]. This indicates that most of the colony losses in Tigray reported in the present study can be attributed to the disaster of the two-year war in the region, which agrees with recent reports that the Tigray war caused 70% honey bee colony losses [39] and reversed decades of ecosystem restoration [37,53], agricultural development [54,55] and livelihood improvement [34] efforts. These effects could lead to shortage of bee forage and increase rates of colony absconding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A previous study [26] showed that the colony loss rate in Tigray was lower (at 15.7% overall, and ranging from 9% to 19.5% between local areas) than the results in this survey and was similar when compared to international (overall proportional) loss rate figures of COLOSS reported as 16.4% to 20.9% [3][4][5]. This indicates that most of the colony losses in Tigray reported in the present study can be attributed to the disaster of the two-year war in the region, which agrees with recent reports that the Tigray war caused 70% honey bee colony losses [39] and reversed decades of ecosystem restoration [37,54], agricultural development [55,56] and livelihood improvement [34] efforts. These effects could lead to habitat degradation, shortage of bee forage and increased rates of colony absconding and death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, various natural and anthropogenic activities, such as frequent drought, deforestation, land degradation, agricultural land expansion, armed conflict, and other human activities, have significantly contributed to the decline in forest cover in Tigray 36 , 69 . Only from 1965 to 1994, the forest land coverage in Tigray decreased by 2.9% in favor of arable land and rangeland 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests a transformation in land use patterns over those years, highlighting a trend where forest and bush areas have been reduced to make way for increased arable cultivation and grazing lands., Between 2000 and 2020, vegetation cover in Tigray increased by 2% due to a continuous reforestation and natural resource rehabilitation initiative 70 – 72 . However, during the period 2020–2022, the vegetation cover decreased by 5% of the area 72 , and forest cover declined on average by 14.5% due to the increased demand for firewood and charcoal during the wartime 69 . H. forskaolii’s coverage and population growth could also be affected by military actions such as destroying trees, soil and water conservation efforts, disrupting soil health 69 , 72 , 73 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation