Lake Restoration Handbook 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93043-5_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of Water Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whenever possible, it is recommended to validate environmental data derived from satellite products at regional and local scales by comparing pixels on a satellite image with ‘real’ field observation data (Henson et al 2015, Trull et al 2018). Simple correlation analyses or more complex ground-truth processes are available to compare satellite and in situ data and to secure the interpretation of satellite-derived products (White-Newsome et al 2013, Allan 2014). This, however, constitutes a huge task and is not performed generally before implementing SDMs.…”
Section: Quality Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever possible, it is recommended to validate environmental data derived from satellite products at regional and local scales by comparing pixels on a satellite image with ‘real’ field observation data (Henson et al 2015, Trull et al 2018). Simple correlation analyses or more complex ground-truth processes are available to compare satellite and in situ data and to secure the interpretation of satellite-derived products (White-Newsome et al 2013, Allan 2014). This, however, constitutes a huge task and is not performed generally before implementing SDMs.…”
Section: Quality Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of this nature are frequently evaluated through statistical correlations with other indicators [56]. In this review, the focus of research is on eight optically active water parameters (Table 2), as follows: chl-α [30,32,33,35,, transparency (SDD) [33,35,[57][58][59]67,77,87,88,90,93,95,97,[101][102][103]110,[112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126], CDOM [60,75,77,82,83,90,92,102,115,, EC [148][149][150]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%