2014
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.960613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of the El Hierro submarine volcanic eruption plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These produced a signal that interfered with that of Chl-a, resulting in unrealistic estimates by the remote sensing Chl-a algorithms, as confirmed when comparing with in situ Chl-a measurements. Our water type classification analysis, based on a previous study carried out in the same area 25 , shows that plume waters were classified as not Chl-a-dominated (Fig. 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These produced a signal that interfered with that of Chl-a, resulting in unrealistic estimates by the remote sensing Chl-a algorithms, as confirmed when comparing with in situ Chl-a measurements. Our water type classification analysis, based on a previous study carried out in the same area 25 , shows that plume waters were classified as not Chl-a-dominated (Fig. 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although multiple patches of abnormally high remote sensing Chl-a were initially observed when the most intense eruptive episodes occurred, these were not associated with phytoplankton blooms. Rather, they were erroneous estimates consequence of the interference produced by discoloured waters that contained great amounts of sulphur compounds 25 . These produced a signal that interfered with that of Chl-a, resulting in unrealistic estimates by the remote sensing Chl-a algorithms, as confirmed when comparing with in situ Chl-a measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the surface, the plume was affected by changes in the meteorological and hydrodynamic conditions. In the first months, the plume ( Figure 2) was observed from the coast and also through satellite images [15,16].…”
Section: A New Submarine Volcanomentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The most important were observed around the volcanic edifice ( Figure 3), but the effect of the volcano emissions reached the whole southern part of the Island of El Hierro. Some influences were also observed in the northern part, as a consequence of the currents in the area [16]. The most important observations in the surface waters were:…”
Section: Signal Of the Eruption In The Sea Surfacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, based on our long multidisciplinary data background in the area, the actual volcanic plume south of the Island of El Hierro produced significant anomalies in the physical-chemical and biological parameters of the whole water column affecting an extensive oceanic area (temperature anomalies from +3°C of up to +18.8°C, salinity anomalies of +0.3, total inorganic carbon concentrations ranging from 4, 000 to 7,500 μmol kg −1 , water acidification of up to 2.8 units, pCO 2 waters with values ranging from 12,000 to 150, 000 μatm at the surface, oxygen depletion near to anoxic levels, enhanced light attenuation-transmittance decrease-, negative redox potential, sulphur concentrations of up to 200 μmol kg −1 , total Fe(II) species of up to 50 μmol kg −1 , and higher concentrations of dissolved Cu, Cd, Pb, and Al, among others), (Fraile-Nuez et al 2012;Santana-Casiano et al 2013;Rivera et al 2013;Ariza et al 2014;Eugenio et al 2014;Coca et al 2014;Ferrera et al 2015). However, no physical-chemical anomaly of the whole water column were registered for the artifacts in the west part of the island, demonstrating that the nature of these structures were not of eruptive origin.…”
Section: Volcanic Plumesmentioning
confidence: 96%