1976
DOI: 10.1029/jc081i021p03660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of soil moisture by a 21-cm passive radiometer

Abstract: Microwave sensors on Skylab collected data as part of the Earth Resources Experiment Package (EREP). An investigation was designed to obtain field observations of soil moisture content for comparison with data from Skylab. The 21‐cm radiometer has been shown to be highly responsive to the moisture content of the upper 2.5‐cm layer of soil. A composite relationship between the radiometric temperature and soil moisture content has been determined from five data sets obtained over Kansas and Texas. This relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, L-band is the optimal wavelength range to observe soil moisture as higher frequencies are more significantly affected by perturbing factors such as atmospheric effects and vegetation cover (Schumugge, 1983;Kerr et al, 2001). Apart from a few days of L-band radiometric observations on Skylab from June 1973 to January 1974 (Eagleman et al, 1976;Jackson et al, 2004), spaceborne microwave radiometers have been operating at frequencies above 5 GHz because the satellite antenna size is directly proportional to the squared wavelength (Ulaby et al, 1982). Recent technological and scientific achievements permitted to develop the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission (Kerr et al, 2001 launched in November 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, L-band is the optimal wavelength range to observe soil moisture as higher frequencies are more significantly affected by perturbing factors such as atmospheric effects and vegetation cover (Schumugge, 1983;Kerr et al, 2001). Apart from a few days of L-band radiometric observations on Skylab from June 1973 to January 1974 (Eagleman et al, 1976;Jackson et al, 2004), spaceborne microwave radiometers have been operating at frequencies above 5 GHz because the satellite antenna size is directly proportional to the squared wavelength (Ulaby et al, 1982). Recent technological and scientific achievements permitted to develop the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission (Kerr et al, 2001 launched in November 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change in emissivity for a soil has been observed by truck mounted radiometers in field experiments (Poe et al, 1971;Blinn and Quade, 1972;Schanda et al, 1978;Newton, 1977) and by radiometers in aircraft (Schmugge, 1974;Burke et a11978;Choudhury, et al, 1979) and satellites (Eagleman and Lin, 1976;Schmugge et al, 1977). In no case were emissivities as low as 0.6 observed for real surfaces.…”
Section: Microwave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These results are encouraging for the use of long wavelength radiometric approaches. Eagleman and Lin (1976) To understand the effects of incidence angle and surface roughness consider the plots of 00 versus angle presented in Figure 12 for five fields with essentially the same moisture content but with considerably different surface roughness. At the longest wavelength (1.1 Oz, Figure 12a), ao for the smoother fields is very sensitive to incidence angle near nadir, while for the roiAgh field cc is almost independent of angle.…”
Section: Microwave Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional satellite techniques for soil moisture monitoring exploit the microwave data advantages, since at these frequencies: i) electro-magnetic radiation leaving the Earth's surface is practically not affected by clouds (in the absence of rain), allowing an "all-weather" capability; ii) the microwave signal is available both during the day and night assuring an "all-time" capability of observing the Earth's surface conditions; iii) thanks to the large contrast between dielectric properties of water and dry soil, microwaves are highly sensitive to the water content in the soil (Eagleman and Lin, 1976;Jackson et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%