2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00909.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote sensing of riverine landscapes

Abstract: 1. The fashion for examining riverine landscapes is changing as our technical instruments, from microprobes to satellites, expands to be able to examine the spatial and temporal relationships among biota, hydrology and geomorphology across scales from microhabitats to channel units to valleys to catchments. 2. The range of successful applications from remote sensing analyses of riverine landscapes has especially increased with the launch of many new instruments that record data across the electromagnetic spect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing has emerged as a potentially powerful 32 tool for detailed, quantitative characterization of fluvial 33 systems across broad geographic areas with improved 34 temporal coverage (Mertes, 2002). Since the early 1990's, 35 numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of remotely 36 sensed data for retrieving suspended sediment concentra-37 tions (Mertes et al, 1993), classifying in-stream habitat 38 (Legleiter & Goodchild, In press;Whited et al, 2002;39 Wright et al, 2000), and estimating water depth (Lyon et al, 40 1992;Marcus et al, 2003;Winterbottom & Gilvear, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing has emerged as a potentially powerful 32 tool for detailed, quantitative characterization of fluvial 33 systems across broad geographic areas with improved 34 temporal coverage (Mertes, 2002). Since the early 1990's, 35 numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of remotely 36 sensed data for retrieving suspended sediment concentra-37 tions (Mertes et al, 1993), classifying in-stream habitat 38 (Legleiter & Goodchild, In press;Whited et al, 2002;39 Wright et al, 2000), and estimating water depth (Lyon et al, 40 1992;Marcus et al, 2003;Winterbottom & Gilvear, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are an increasing number of sensing technologies used for mapping both landscape and water properties including optical sensors, light detection and ranging (LiDAR), forward-looking infrared (FLIR), and radio detection and ranging (RADAR) (Mertes 2002). These high-tech devices are deployed from multiple platforms that range from low-altitude tethered balloons to drones, to helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft up to outer space satellites, thereby producing data with sub-centimeter to multimeter grain resolution across scales from microhabitats to channel units to valleys to catchments.…”
Section: Methods and Data In Land Use Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water temperature can also be monitored by remote sensing to allow distributed measurement of connectivity between channels and backswamps that are typically inaccessible to field crews. There are several satellites available for this monitoring (Mertes, 2002;Ritchie and others, 2003), and testing of sensitivity for each one at the onset of the river reintroduction would be beneficial to determine which is most appropriate for this application. Swarzenski and others (2008) showed that the ratio of calcium to magnesium was an effective tracer of river connection in two Louisiana marshes, and novel tracers such as this could be tested and developed in the Maurepas Swamp project area.…”
Section: Hydrologic Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%