2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70808-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of Crystal Shapes in Ice Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shortwave reflectance measurements provide a robust means of inferring r e at cloud tops (Platnick et al, 2017) but rely on assumptions of ice scattering properties, most importantly assumed g (Holz et al, 2016). In situ and satellite measurements have suggested that rough or distorted compact crystals with smooth phase functions and visible asymmetry parameters near 0.75 dominate globally (Holz et al, 2016; Järvinen et al, 2018) (see van Diedenhoven, 2018, for an overview on ice shape remote sensing). However, the presented interquartile and full ranges of such measurements are large, indicating substantial variation of crystal shape, distortion, and scattering properties regionally and globally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortwave reflectance measurements provide a robust means of inferring r e at cloud tops (Platnick et al, 2017) but rely on assumptions of ice scattering properties, most importantly assumed g (Holz et al, 2016). In situ and satellite measurements have suggested that rough or distorted compact crystals with smooth phase functions and visible asymmetry parameters near 0.75 dominate globally (Holz et al, 2016; Järvinen et al, 2018) (see van Diedenhoven, 2018, for an overview on ice shape remote sensing). However, the presented interquartile and full ranges of such measurements are large, indicating substantial variation of crystal shape, distortion, and scattering properties regionally and globally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different habits of ice crystals have varying single‐scattering characteristics and correspond to different microphysical properties and radiative properties (Letu et al, , ). Moreover, from the perspective of radiative transfer simulations and remote sensing involved in the general circulation models, ice clouds previously could not be reliably represented because the current knowledge on the natural variation of ice crystal shapes is still incomplete (Diedenhoven, ). Thus, the classification of ice crystal habits can promote the development of ice cloud remote sensing and radiative transfer simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water cloud retrievals include cloud optical depth and standard bi-spectral droplet size estimates (Platnick et al, 2016), as well as both parametric (Alexandrov et al, 2012b) and nonparametric (Alexandrov et al, 2012a) droplet size distribution estimates that use polarization (Alexandrov et al, 2018). Most clouds observed during ACEPOL were low-level water clouds, but when ice clouds were detected, cloud optical depth, particle size, and particle shape/roughness retrievals (Van Diedenhoven et al, 2012, 2013Van Diedenhoven, 2018) were retrieved. Level 2 processing for aerosol retrievals uses the Microphysical Aerosol Properties from Polarimetry (MAPP) algorithm .…”
Section: The Research Scanning Polarimeter (Rsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%