2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2731997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification Using Bag of Convolutional Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the complementary information of different features, the spatial feature extraction method may be a better choice for reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral images before band selection. In the future work, more advanced features, such as deep learning-based features, can be considered to improve the performance further [32,33]. Besides, the spectral and spatial information can be fused to obtain more powerful features [34,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the complementary information of different features, the spatial feature extraction method may be a better choice for reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral images before band selection. In the future work, more advanced features, such as deep learning-based features, can be considered to improve the performance further [32,33]. Besides, the spectral and spatial information can be fused to obtain more powerful features [34,35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we perform RSIR using features extracted from two state-of-the-art RS classification networks. These are Bag-of-Convolutional-Features (BoCF) [61] and Discriminative CNNs (D-CNN) [62]. For BoCF, we directly use the histogrammic image representations extracted from the pretrained VGG16 network.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Rsir Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation. The classical pattern recognition and machine learning tasks [21][22][23] mainly adopt a robust classifier learnt by annotated training data and assume the testing data and the training data belong to the same feature space or distribution. However, it is unrealistic in real-world applications because of the high price of manual labeling training samples and environmental restrictions.…”
Section: Transfer Learning and Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%