2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
240
0
58

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
240
0
58
Order By: Relevance
“…Por meio da matriz de confusão, calculou-se o índice kappa (k) e as acurácias do método (A M ), para o usuário (A U ) e global (A G ), a fim de avaliar a acurácia da classificação obtida e do método empregado (Congalton & Green, 2009). Para julgar o valor k calculado, foram considerados os intervalos amplamente adotados para este fim (Richards, 2013), com os seguintes valores: abaixo de 0,4 como indicação de uma classificação ruim; entre 0,41 e 0,6, moderada; entre 0,61 e 0,75, boa; entre 0,76 e 0,80, excelente; e, para valores maiores que 0,81, classificação quase perfeita.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Por meio da matriz de confusão, calculou-se o índice kappa (k) e as acurácias do método (A M ), para o usuário (A U ) e global (A G ), a fim de avaliar a acurácia da classificação obtida e do método empregado (Congalton & Green, 2009). Para julgar o valor k calculado, foram considerados os intervalos amplamente adotados para este fim (Richards, 2013), com os seguintes valores: abaixo de 0,4 como indicação de uma classificação ruim; entre 0,41 e 0,6, moderada; entre 0,61 e 0,75, boa; entre 0,76 e 0,80, excelente; e, para valores maiores que 0,81, classificação quase perfeita.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…This study comprises only the burned regions, which covered an area of~8 km 2 . A maximum likelihood classifier [59] was calibrated using a set of training sites located in the scene. The number of training sites of each class ranged between 13 and 21.…”
Section: Airborne Hyperspectral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TD is a measure of the statistical separation between categories response patterns computed for all pairs of categories and presented in the form of a matrix. It is based on the covariance of the samples for each category at the pixel level and estimates a weight which exponentially decreases to enlarge the distances between categories (Richards, 2013). The TD values are normalized to the range of [0 , 2] and as a general rule it can be accepted that good spectral separability occurs for values higher than 1.9, moderate spectral separability for values between 1.7 and 1.9 and poor spectral separability (i.e.…”
Section: Acacia Spatial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richards, 2013). Available commercial imagery is not always cheap or has the desired resolutions (spatial, spectral, radiometric and temporal) for the study to be developed (e.g.…”
Section: Directions For Future Research -Satellite Remote Sensing Andmentioning
confidence: 99%