Rockfall Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118601532.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing and Monitoring Techniques for the Characterization of Rock Mass Deformation and Change Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the weaknesses of GB-SAR are the loss of coherence in the radar wavelength in the case of rapid changes between survey epochs (e.g. rockfalls), a more complex set-up compared with TLS and a significantly lower spatial resolution, usually ranging from 1 to 100 square metres (Tarchi et al, 2005;Corsini et al, 2006;Teza et al, 2008;Derron et al, 2011).…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the weaknesses of GB-SAR are the loss of coherence in the radar wavelength in the case of rapid changes between survey epochs (e.g. rockfalls), a more complex set-up compared with TLS and a significantly lower spatial resolution, usually ranging from 1 to 100 square metres (Tarchi et al, 2005;Corsini et al, 2006;Teza et al, 2008;Derron et al, 2011).…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three sets of cracks were equipped with three sets of crack-meters to measure the potential slippage and rotational dynamic of the rock mass. Since then, they have been surveyed each summer with a tape extensometer (repeatability: ±1 mm; Nordvik et al, 2010;Derron et al, 2013), or with a Vernier caliper (for the crack closest to the hut on the north side).…”
Section: Crack Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of potential rockfall sources and the detection of deformations prior to failure are crucial for improving rockfall hazard assessment (Terzaghi 1962;Saito 1969;Fukuzono 1985;Zvelebill and Moser 2001;Crosta and Agliardi 2003;Corominas et al 2005). Over the past 15 years, the rapid development of remote sensing techniques such as ground-based InSAR and LiDAR has dramatically revolutionized the characterization and monitoring of rock mass deformation (Slob and Hack 2004;Rosser et al 2007;Sitar 2005, 2008;Oppikofer et al 2009;Derron et al 2011;Jaboyedoff et al 2012;Dehls et al 2014;Rouyet et al 2017). High spatio-temporal resolution monitoring of rock cliffs using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds (e.g., Abellán et al 2009Abellán et al , 2010Rosser et al 2013;Royán et al 2014Royán et al , 2015Kromer et al 2015aKromer et al , 2018Stock et al 2018) has shown that it is possible in some cases to detect precursor deformations below centimetric scale and to monitor them over time until failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%