Nuclear Decommissioning 2012
DOI: 10.1533/9780857095336.2.346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote operation and robotics technologies in nuclear decommissioning projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since various operations are carried out inside the reactor building to remove the debris, it is essential to improve the environment through decontamination, concealment, and removal of radiation sources to reduce radiation levels [5]. In a highradiation environment such as the inside of a nuclear reactor building, it is dangerous for people to work directly, and because of this limitation, the development of remotecontrol devices and robots for surveying and decontaminating the inside of nuclear reactor buildings is underway [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition, training for operating these remotely operated devices and remotely operated robots and the development of technologies to improve their operability are also underway [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since various operations are carried out inside the reactor building to remove the debris, it is essential to improve the environment through decontamination, concealment, and removal of radiation sources to reduce radiation levels [5]. In a highradiation environment such as the inside of a nuclear reactor building, it is dangerous for people to work directly, and because of this limitation, the development of remotecontrol devices and robots for surveying and decontaminating the inside of nuclear reactor buildings is underway [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition, training for operating these remotely operated devices and remotely operated robots and the development of technologies to improve their operability are also underway [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these substitution demands, a promising aspect is the inspection and intervention of nuclear accidents, where source locations are uncertain and high-dose ionizing radiation exists (Qian et al , 2012). To tackle the nuclear accident scenario, a great deal of effort has gone into sensory perception and operational reliability in earlier studies (Michal, 2012; Nagatani et al , 2013; Ducros et al , 2017), whereas little attention has been paid to shielding protection. These intervention systems mainly focus on environmental exploration under the low-dose circumstance in crippled nuclear plants, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other CBRN accidents, the existence of ionizing radiation and corresponding reinforcement measures is the primary concern in nuclear disasters (Murphy et al , 2012). In terms of accident sites and irradiation levels, the emergency accidents can be broadly summarized as follows (Michal, 2012): explosion and leakage in nuclear power plants; mechanical dislocation and blockage of irradiation equipment; and theft or loss of radiation source in an industrial field. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers can refer to Détriché (), Desbats et al. (), and Michal () for a more complete review of robotics technologies in nuclear decommissioning. In this paper, the focus is on “upstream” characterizations and more specifically on radiological characterizations (Andrieu et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%