River Flow 2014 2014
DOI: 10.1201/b17133-259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote monitoring of volumetric discharge based on surface mean and turbulent metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If PTV is applied instead of PIV, then single tracer pathlines could be smoothed by de-spiking similar to the methodology of Goring & Nikora (2002), and spatial resolution could be refined as well. Once all these optimizations are fulfilled, volumetric discharge could be estimated via turbulence length scales without directly determining the actual water depth, as tested by Johnson & Cowen (2014) under laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If PTV is applied instead of PIV, then single tracer pathlines could be smoothed by de-spiking similar to the methodology of Goring & Nikora (2002), and spatial resolution could be refined as well. Once all these optimizations are fulfilled, volumetric discharge could be estimated via turbulence length scales without directly determining the actual water depth, as tested by Johnson & Cowen (2014) under laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the mechanisms behind the apparently random nature of free surface fluctuations could unlock the potential to predict the free surface pattern for a given flow condition. Furthermore, the understanding of free surface dynamics may enable non-intrusive characterization of flow conditions and hydraulic energy losses based solely on measured free surface behaviour (Fujita, Furutani, & Okanishi, 2011;Horoshenkov, Nichols, Tait, & Maximov, 2013;Johnson & Cowen, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Cowen [] also showed that the length scale normalized by the flow depth is linearly dependent on the turbulent Reynolds number ( ReT=ULν, where U is the current speed). The Hudson River data (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They report the transverse and stream wise length scale as 0.5D and 2.5D, respectively for water depth ranging from 10 to 30 cm. Johnson and Cowen [2014] also showed that the length scale normalized by the flow depth is linearly dependent on the turbulent Reynolds number (Re T 5 UL m , where U is the current speed). The Hudson River data (cf.…”
Section: 1002/2015jc010746mentioning
confidence: 96%