2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2007.00104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote monitoring of nests using digital camera technology

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Although cameras have been used for many years to collect data at birds' nests, recent advances in digital technology have led to increased storage capacity, faster and easier review of data, and reduced power consumption. The development of sophisticated triggering mechanisms, such as video motion detection, herald a new era of portable, energy-efficient systems that require less frequent maintenance. We used a digital infrared camera system to monitor predation events at the nests of ground-nesting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Benson et al 2010, Bolton et al 2007, Brown et al 1998, Buler and Hamilton 2000, Carter et al 2007, Coates et al 2010, Conner et al 2010, Farnsworth and Simons 2000, Franca et al 2009, Franzreb 2007, Granfors et al 2001, Grant et al 2006, Herranz et al 2002, King and DeGraaf 2006, Liebezeit and George 2003, Lusk et al 2006, Major and Gowing 1994. Marzluff et al 2007, McKinnon and Bety 2009, Moore and Reid 2009, Morgan et al 2006, Morrison and Bolger 2002, Perkins et al 2005, Peterson et al 2004, Pietz and Granfors 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Benson et al 2010, Bolton et al 2007, Brown et al 1998, Buler and Hamilton 2000, Carter et al 2007, Coates et al 2010, Conner et al 2010, Farnsworth and Simons 2000, Franca et al 2009, Franzreb 2007, Granfors et al 2001, Grant et al 2006, Herranz et al 2002, King and DeGraaf 2006, Liebezeit and George 2003, Lusk et al 2006, Major and Gowing 1994. Marzluff et al 2007, McKinnon and Bety 2009, Moore and Reid 2009, Morgan et al 2006, Morrison and Bolger 2002, Perkins et al 2005, Peterson et al 2004, Pietz and Granfors 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is a need to correlate video observations with times and events that are consistent with experimental design and project objectives. Video systems that use similar technology to the SSM system described in this study have been used in conjunction with activity or proximity based actuators (Davis et al, 2004;Bolton et al, 2007;Rillahan et al, 2009;Steen, 2009) which cue the recording of information within an area of interest or during certain types or levels of activity. The merging of data streams through video systems initiated by physical cues such as light, depth or temperature or the integration with other remote sensing technologies such as ultrasonic tagging devices offers opportunities to correlate video information with other sources of data, increase sampling efficiency and reduce potential sources of systematic bias such as autocorrelation associated with continuous sampling (Hooker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nests were deemed to have been successful if chicks had reached fledging age and the nest showed signs of success (well‐trodden lining, droppings and/or feather scale present), if fledged young were seen nearby, or if adult activity indicated fledged chicks in the vicinity (alarm calling or feeding). The cause of nest failure (abandonment or predation) was determined either directly using evidence recorded by remote digital nest cameras following methods described by Bolton et al . (2007), or by interpretation of signs at or around the nest, based on experience gained from the camera evidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%