“…As a general remark, for any possible telehealth service and architecture to be designed, a large literature of similar or comparable experiences exists and can provide useful insights about possible advantages and disadvantages and provisional and forecast data about expected outcomes and impact on patients. Many comprehensive overviews of possible monitoring approaches for HF, from structured telephone monitoring to monitoring with home-based portable technology or specially designed wearable and implantable devices, are available in the literature, such as in the study by Bhimaraj,6 or about the specific components of the homecare intervention, such as in the study by Jaarsma et al 20 Suitably designed (ie, compliant, user-friendly, safe) devices for RPM have been shown to increase the patients' role in the management of their own health, improve chronic disease management, and reduce the incidence of acute episodes. By using a variety of integrated or standalone RPM devices, up-to-date information on patients' chronic disease and/or post-acute care status (including vital signs, heart rate, blood glucose levels, medication management, mental health, physical and cognitive fitness), and other data (such as patient's location, or ambient parameters) can be transmitted to family caregivers, providers, or third parties in charge of patient monitoring.…”