2013
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote biopsy darting and marking of polar bears

Abstract: Remote biopsy darting of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) is less invasive and time intensive than physical capture and is therefore useful when capture is challenging or unsafe. We worked with two manufacturers to develop a combination biopsy and marking dart for use on polar bears. We had an 80% success rate of collecting a tissue sample with a single biopsy dart and collected tissue samples from 143 polar bears on land, in water, and on sea ice. Dye marks ensured that 96% of the bears were not resampled during… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polar bears were then grouped according to sex/age class as cubs-of-the-year, yearlings, 2-yr-old dependent cubs, subadult (independent 2-, 3-, and 4-yr-old) females and males, and adult (5-yr-old and older) females and males. All bears were genetically identified (Pagano et al 2014).…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar bears were then grouped according to sex/age class as cubs-of-the-year, yearlings, 2-yr-old dependent cubs, subadult (independent 2-, 3-, and 4-yr-old) females and males, and adult (5-yr-old and older) females and males. All bears were genetically identified (Pagano et al 2014).…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring the condition of AFs is critical as it is pregnant and lactating AFs and their cubs that are of greatest concern with respect to climate change impacts (Robbins et al 2012b). Moreover, because remotely collected samples can be obtained using biopsy darts (Pagano et al 2014), body condition assessments can be accomplished relatively noninvasively, which may be preferential in more remote areas and for other concerns (Peacock et al 2011;Vongraven et al 2012). Though our findings are encouraging, we have also identified limitations of the lipid content CI that warrant further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This dataset provides an opportunity to thoroughly evaluate adipose lipid content as a CI. In response to some community, management, and scientist concerns (with regard to, e.g., capture, handling, collaring, chemical immobilization,), noninvasive sampling methods have been proposed (Peacock et al 2011;Vongraven et al 2012) and developed for polar bears and other wildlife (e.g., Fedigan 2010;Herreman and Peacock 2013;Pagano et al 2014). Here, we also test the applicability of lipid content to recently collected SB polar bear remote biopsies for which no established CIs besides FI could be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[266][267][268][269]. Furthermore, many field projects either utilize bands or dyes for individual identification or depend on researchers' ability to visually distinguish individuals [270][271][272]. Therefore, by accompanying field workers or training them in sample preservation, gut microbiome researchers should be able to obtain samples from identified host individuals fairly easily.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%