2018
DOI: 10.21432/t2j682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote assistive technology training in Newfoundland and Labrador’s rural schools: Is there a need? | Perceptions des enseignants quant au besoin de formation en technologie d’assistance dans les écoles rurales de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador

Abstract: This study examined the perceptions of teachers in rural Newfoundland (NL) about their current ability to support the use of assistive technology (AT) in their classrooms, and identified possible training needs that could be accomplished remotely. Thirty-two educators from rural areas of NL completed an online survey with a mix of closed-and open-ended questions. Five dimensions were explored for this needs assessment including: current beliefs, skills, use, comfort level, and perceptions of AT; identification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) mandates that AT must be considered for all students eligible for special education during the development of their Individualized Education Program (IEP), which underscores the importance of AT in the education of students with disabilities. This is in line with the consensus within the literature of the potential benefits of AT for students with disabilities (Judge and Simms, 2009;Maich et al, 2017;Michaels and McDermott, 2003). AT supports access to the general education curriculum (Boyle and Kennedy, 2019;Bryant et al, 1998;Maor et al, 2011;Winter and O'Raw, 2010), and has been posited as one of the major factors that can facilitate successful inclusion and level the educational opportunities for students with disabilities (Bouck and Long, 2020;Michaels and McDermott, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) mandates that AT must be considered for all students eligible for special education during the development of their Individualized Education Program (IEP), which underscores the importance of AT in the education of students with disabilities. This is in line with the consensus within the literature of the potential benefits of AT for students with disabilities (Judge and Simms, 2009;Maich et al, 2017;Michaels and McDermott, 2003). AT supports access to the general education curriculum (Boyle and Kennedy, 2019;Bryant et al, 1998;Maor et al, 2011;Winter and O'Raw, 2010), and has been posited as one of the major factors that can facilitate successful inclusion and level the educational opportunities for students with disabilities (Bouck and Long, 2020;Michaels and McDermott, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Teachers’ lack of knowledge and skills related to AT and its integration into teaching and learning practices for SWD hinders successful AT implementation (Judge & Simms, 2009; Park et al, 2022; Schaaf, 2018; Wilson et al, 2011). The literature (Atanga et al, 2020; Schaaf, 2018) has indicated that teacher education programs inadequately prepare special education teachers to use AT, and that deficiencies in AT education in teacher education programs is considered to be one of the main barriers to successful AT implementation (Atanga et al, 2020; Kutlu, Schreglmann, & Cinisli, 2018; Maich, van Rhijn, Woods, & Brochu, 2017). Atanga et al (2020) claimed that special education teachers who completed an AT course in their undergraduate program self-reported higher AT-related knowledge in the workplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%