2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1649-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote activation of referred phantom sensation and cortical reorganization in human upper extremity amputees

Abstract: Phantom limb sensation, whether painful or not, frequently occurs after peripheral nerve lesions. It can be elicited by stimulating body parts adjacent to the amputation site (referred to as phantom sensation) and it is often similar in quality to the stimulation at the remote site. The present study induced referred phantom sensations in two upper limb amputees. Neuroelectric source imaging (ESI) as well as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to assess reorganization in primary somatosensory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
41
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It was later shown that referred sensations such as those described by Ramachandran et al (25) can also be elicited from areas far removed from the amputated limb, for example from the foot in arm amputees. This led to the conclusion that alterations in the organisation of S1 -where arm and foot are represented far apart -are most likely not the neuronal substrate of referred phantom sensations (29,30). Similar results were obtained when the motor cortex was investigated.…”
Section: Phantom Limb Pain and Cortical Reorganisationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It was later shown that referred sensations such as those described by Ramachandran et al (25) can also be elicited from areas far removed from the amputated limb, for example from the foot in arm amputees. This led to the conclusion that alterations in the organisation of S1 -where arm and foot are represented far apart -are most likely not the neuronal substrate of referred phantom sensations (29,30). Similar results were obtained when the motor cortex was investigated.…”
Section: Phantom Limb Pain and Cortical Reorganisationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Since the demonstration of cortical somatosensory map reorganization in peripherally deafferented adult primates (Merzenich et al, 1984;Pons et al, 1991) and rats Sanes et al, 1990), attention was turned to mechanisms that could explain phantom sensations in humans, presuming that they might be perceptual correlates of cortical reorganization after amputation (Ramachandran et al, 1992;Flor et al, 1995;Montoya et al, 1997;Grüsser et al, 2004). Most studies in upper limb amputees with phantom pain claim that it would be a correlate of functional remapping within the deafferented cortex (Ramachandran, 1993;Birbaumer et al, 1997;Borsook et al, 1998;Flor et al, 1998;Montoya et al, 1998;Lotze et al, 1999;Dettmers et al, 2001;Grüsser et al, 2001;Karl et al, 2001;Lotze et al, 2001;MacIver et al, 2008).…”
Section: Functional Reorganization Related To Nonpainful Phantom Phenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is widely considered that somatotopic reorganization is an essential element for phantom referred sensation that can often be induced by tactile stimulation on particular body parts in the amputees (e.g., tactile stimulation on the face induces abnormal sensations on the lost arm/fingers; Ramachandran and Hirstein, 1998). It is thought that peripheral nerve injury causes a contamination of ectopic afferent information in the somatosensory afferent pathway; the abnormal mismatch between incoming and outgoing somatotopic information in the CNS results in distorting perception of own body images, leading to the phantom sensation (Kew et al, 1997; Davis et al, 1998; Grüsser et al, 2004; Flor et al, 2006). In the somatosensory thalamus, microstimulation of the VPL in the amputees whose thalamic receptive fields are largely reorganized can induce phantom sensations (Davis et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%