1979
DOI: 10.3109/17453677908991303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remodelling After Distal Forearm Fractures in Children II:The Final Orientation of the Distal and Proximal Epiphyseal Plates of the Radius

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria for acceptable postreduction alignment and apposition were developed with use of commonly accepted guidelines [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and by consensus of the group of six orthopaedic surgeons participating in the study. These same criteria were also used to guide treatment at the initial presentation of the child at the emergency department.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for acceptable postreduction alignment and apposition were developed with use of commonly accepted guidelines [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and by consensus of the group of six orthopaedic surgeons participating in the study. These same criteria were also used to guide treatment at the initial presentation of the child at the emergency department.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this ambiguity stems from a lack of consensus about the remodeling potential of the distal radius. Friberg reported that fractures with over 20°of dorsal angulation may not remodel completely, but Hughston demonstrated that, in children under 10 years of age, the distal radius can remodel up to 30-40°of angulation in the sagittal plane [8,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations are frequently performed (Green et al 1998). The great remodeling potential in a child's distal radius allows dorsal angulation of up to 20° for good clinical and anatomical long-term results (Friberg 1979, Qairul et al 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%